Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22689682›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2012

Favorable outcome of patients who have 13q deletion: a suggestion for revision of the WHO 'MDS-U' designation.

Kohei Hosokawa, Takamasa Katagiri, Naomi Sugimori, Ken Ishiyama, Yumi Sasaki, Yu Seiki, Aiko Sato-Otsubo, Masashi Sanada, Seishi Ogawa, Shinji Nakao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic Markers of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kohei HosokawaCellular Transplantation Biology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8640, Japan.
Takamasa Katagiri
Naomi Sugimori
Ken Ishiyama
Yumi Sasaki
Yu Seiki
Aiko Sato-Otsubo
Masashi Sanada
Seishi Ogawa
Shinji Nakao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize bone marrow failure with del(13q), we reviewed clinical records of 22 bone marrow failure patients possessing del(13q) alone or del(13q) plus other abnormalities. All del(13q) patients were diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome-unclassified due to the absence of apparent dysplasia. Elevated glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient blood cell percentages were detected in all 16 with del(13q) alone and 3 of 6 (50%) patients with del(13q) plus other abnormalities. All 14 patients with del(13q) alone and 2 of 5 (40%) patients with del(13q) plus other abnormalities responded to immunosuppressive therapy with 10-year overall survival rates of 83% and 67%, respectively. Only 2 patients who had abnormalities in addition to the del(13q) abnormality developed acute myeloid leukemia. Given that myelodysplastic syndrome-unclassified with del(13q) is a benign bone marrow failure subset characterized by good response to immunosuppressive therapy and a high prevalence of increased glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient cells, del(13q) should not be considered an intermediate-risk chromosomal abnormality.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemia, AplasticAnemia, RefractoryAntibodies, MonoclonalChromosomes, Human, Pair 13FemaleFlow CytometryFollow-Up StudiesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID22689682
PMCPMC3590091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.