Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22689068›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2012

An automated system designed for large scale NMR data deposition and annotation: application to over 600 assigned chemical shift data entries to the BioMagResBank from the Riken Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative internal database.

Naohiro Kobayashi, Yoko Harano, Naoya Tochio, Eiichi Nakatani, Takanori Kigawa, Shigeyuki Yokoyama, Steve Mading, Eldon L Ulrich, John L Markley, Hideo Akutsu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of helix induction by the closed loop.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naohiro KobayashiInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka University, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871 Osaka, Japan. naohiro@protein.osaka-u.ac.jp
Yoko Harano
Naoya Tochio
Eiichi Nakatani
Takanori Kigawa
Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Steve Mading
Eldon L Ulrich
John L Markley
Hideo Akutsu
Toshimichi Fujiwara

Funding

Biological Magnetic Resonance Databank: Metabolomics / Small Molecule ActivitiesP41LM005799 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MARKLEY, JOHN LUTE · 1996 to 2013
$12.6M
The BMRB as an evolving resource for biomolecular structure-function researchR01GM109046 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2014 to 2022
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109046NLM NIH HHS P41 LM005799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular NMR chemical shift data are key information for the functional analysis of biomolecules and the development of new techniques for NMR studies utilizing chemical shift statistical information. Structural genomics projects are major contributors to the accumulation of protein chemical shift information. The management of the large quantities of NMR data generated by each project in a local database and the transfer of the data to the public databases are still formidable tasks because of the complicated nature of NMR data. Here we report an automated and efficient system developed for the deposition and annotation of a large number of data sets including (1)H, (13)C and (15)N resonance assignments used for the structure determination of proteins. We have demonstrated the feasibility of our system by applying it to over 600 entries from the internal database generated by the RIKEN Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative (RSGI) to the public database, BioMagResBank (BMRB). We have assessed the quality of the deposited chemical shifts by comparing them with those predicted from the PDB coordinate entry for the corresponding protein. The same comparison for other matched BMRB/PDB entries deposited from 2001-2011 has been carried out and the results suggest that the RSGI entries greatly improved the quality of the BMRB database. Since the entries include chemical shifts acquired under strikingly similar experimental conditions, these NMR data can be expected to be a promising resource to improve current technologies as well as to develop new NMR methods for protein studies.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinSoftwareGenomicsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteinsProteomicsQuality ControlProteins

Identifiers

PMID22689068
PMCPMC4308039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.