ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012
Antigen presentation assays to investigate uncharacterized immunoregulatory genes.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antigen presentation to T lymphocytes is the seminal triggering event of the specific immune response, and poxviruses encode immunomodulatory genes that disrupt this process. Discovery of viral proteins that interfere with steps in the antigen presentation process requires a robust, easily manipulated antigen-presenting and T lymphocyte response system. Use of fresh primary antigen-presenting cells (APC) is preferable because cell lines that can present antigen in vitro are often not representative of APC in vivo and are typically weak stimulators. To study immunomodulatory poxvirus genes, we have used infected primary rat macrophages to present a model antigen, the myelin basic protein peptide, to a cognate CD4+ RsL11 T cell clone. Using this system, viruses can be assessed for difference in immunomodulation, and viral gene functions may also be assayed by comparing effects of wild type virus and mutant viruses (e.g., a deletion in the putative immunomodulatory gene). While antigen presentation can be thought of as a single event, it can also be considered as a larger process comprising multiple steps including: antigen acquisition, antigen processing, peptide loading onto MHC molecules, transport to the surface, MHC binding to T cell receptor, interaction of costimulatory molecules, cell signaling, cytokine synthesis by both cells, and proliferation of antigen specific T lymphocytes. This system allows for the initial determination of whether there is a phenotype and then also allows the stepwise deconstruction of the system to analyze this process at several points to focus in on the mechanism of immunomodulation. We have used this model system to elucidate the function of a highly conserved but previously uncharacterized poxvirus gene that we showed was important for virulence in rodents. The experimental system developed should be broadly applicable to analyzing viral effects on immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.