ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2012
Impact of CYP2D6 polymorphism on tamoxifen therapy: where are we?
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tamoxifen induces a pluripotency signature in breast cancer cells and human tumors.Molecular oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tamoxifen is a mainstay in the treatment of hormone-receptor sensitive breast cancer. To be effective, it needs conversion into 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and endoxifen. The key enzyme involved is encoded by the gene CYP2D6 of which several, sometimes population-specific alleles are known. Corresponding enzyme variants may result in poor, intermediate, and extensive metabolization and therefore different steady-state plasma levels of active metabolites. Those are hypothesized to be linked to clinical outcomes of tamoxifen therapy. However, a wealth of mostly retrospective cohort studies came up with conflicting results. Appraisal of these studies is difficult and a metaanalysis impossible due to heterogeneity of patient populations, disease factors, treatment modalities, and measured outcomes. As standardization would not overcome intrinsic limitations of retrospective analyses, prospective trials comparing genotype-guided versus unsighted tamoxifen treatment are required to prove whether routine CYP2D6 genotyping is clinically effective and cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22688624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.