Preferences among diseases on a genetic susceptibility test for common health conditions: an ancillary study of the multiplex initiative.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.AJOB empirical bioethics
   Trial
2. Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults.PloS one · 2017
   Article
3. Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.Clinical genetics · 2015
   Article
4. Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2014
   Article
5. Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.Genome medicine · 2014
   Article
6. On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2013
   Article
7. Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2013
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as