ArticleBMJ case reports2011
Corrected ASD: case closed?
Article in BMJ case reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (EvC) is a rare autosomal recessive chondroectodermal dysplasia, associated with mutations in the EVC1 and EVC2 genes (4p16). The management of EvC is multidisciplinary, and early diagnosis is of the utmost importance for efficient and timely treatment. The main prognostic determinant is presence of a heart defect. The authors describe the case of a 42-year-old man referred to our outpatient cardiology clinic, following surgical repair of an atrial septal defect. He had presented to different medical specialties on numerous occasions since childhood, but remained without a clear diagnosis for more than 40 years. This case reinforces the need for a holistic view when assessing a patient with congenital heart disease. Moreover, this illustrates the importance of communication and discussion between different medical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.