Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22687502›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Vancomycin tolerance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: influence of vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin on differential resistance gene expression.

Warren E Rose, Michael Fallon, John J M Moran, Joshua P Vanderloo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. In-patient evolution of a high-persisterProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Persistent Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Small cationic antimicrobial peptides delocalize peripheral membrane proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  20. New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Warren E RosePharmacy Practice Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. werose@pharmacy.wisc.edu
Michael Fallon
John J M Moran
Joshua P Vanderloo
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates that are susceptible to vancomycin but are tolerant to its killing effect may present a potential challenge for effective treatment. This study compared the microbiologic characteristics of clinical vancomycin-tolerant (VT-MRSA) and vancomycin-susceptible (VS-MRSA) strains using phenotypic and gene regulation studies. MRSA isolates collected from vancomycin-treated patients with bacteremia over a 5-year period were analyzed for vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin susceptibility, as well as accessory gene regulator (agr) group and function. Vancomycin tolerance was defined by a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)/minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥32 mg/liter. VT-MRSA isolates were compared to VS-MRSA isolates for differences in antimicrobial susceptibility, time-kill activity, and gene expression of key cell envelope response genes vraSR, dltA, and mprF. All 115 isolates evaluated were susceptible to vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin. Seven isolates (6%) were VT-MRSA. agr group II was more prevalent in isolates with vancomycin MBC/MIC ratios of ≥8. In time-kill analyses, VT-MRSA had reduced vancomycin killing, but daptomycin and telavancin activities were maintained. Significantly greater gene expression was observed in VT-MRSA after 72 h of subinhibitory antibiotic exposures. Vancomycin most notably increased vraSR expression (P = 0.002 versus VS-MRSA strains). Daptomycin and telavancin increased expression of all genes studied, most significantly mprF expression (P < 0.001). Longer durations of antibiotic exposure (72 h versus 24 h) resulted in substantial increases in gene expression in VT-MRSA. Although the clinical impact of VT-MRSA is not fully recognized, these data suggest that VT-MRSA strains, while still susceptible, have altered gene regulation to adapt to the antimicrobial effects of glyco- and lipopeptides that may emerge during prolonged durations of exposure.

Indexed as

AminoacyltransferasesAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDaptomycinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug ToleranceGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansLipoglycopeptidesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceAminoacyltransferasesAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDaptomycinDNA-Binding ProteinsLipoglycopeptidesmprF protein, Staphylococcus aureustelavancinVancomycinVraR protein, Staphylococcus aureusVraS protein, Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID22687502
PMCPMC3421561
OpenAlexW2106310886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.