Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22687235›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Continuity in different care modes and its relationship to quality of life: a randomised controlled trial in patients with COPD.

Annemarie A Uijen, Erik Wma Bischoff, Francois G Schellevis, Hans Hj Bor, Wil Jhm van den Bosch, Henk J Schers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The effect of team collaboration and continuity of care on health and disability among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey-based study from western Norway.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Depth of the patient-doctor relationship and content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annemarie A UijenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. A.Uijen@elg.umcn.nl
Erik Wma Bischoff
Francois G Schellevis
Hans Hj Bor
Wil Jhm van den Bosch
Henk J Schers
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew care modes in primary care may affect patients' experienced continuity of care.

aimTo analyse whether experienced continuity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) changes after different care modes are introduced, and to analyse the relationship between continuity of care and patients' quality of life. DESIGN AND

settingRandomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up in general practice in the Netherlands.

methodA total of 180 patients with COPD were randomly assigned to three different care modes: self-management, regular monitoring by a practice nurse, and care provided by the GP at the patient's own initiative (usual care). Experienced continuity of care as personal continuity (proportion of visits with patient's own GP) and team continuity (continuity by the primary healthcare team) was measured using a self-administered patient questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire.

resultsOf the final sample (n = 148), those patients receiving usual care experienced the highest personal continuity, although the chance of not contacting any care provider was also highest in this group (29% versus 2% receiving self-management, and 5% receiving regular monitoring). There were no differences in experienced team continuity in the three care modes. No relationship was found between continuity and changes in quality of life.

conclusionAlthough personal continuity decreases when new care modes are introduced, no evidence that this affects patients' experienced team continuity or patients' quality of life was found. Patients still experienced smooth, ongoing care, and considered care to be connected. Overall, no evidence was found indicating that the introduction of new care modes in primary care for patients with COPD should be discouraged.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareQuality of LifeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient Care TeamPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf CareSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID22687235
PMCPMC3361122
OpenAlexW2147701863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.