Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22687147›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2012

Bilateral lesions of the thalamic trigeminal orosensory area dissociate natural from drug reward in contrast paradigms.

Jennifer E Nyland, Danielle N Alexander, Nu-Chu Liang, Patricia S Grigson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E NylandDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. jen166@psu.edu
Danielle N Alexander
Nu-Chu Liang
Patricia S Grigson
Pennsylvania State University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

DRUGS OF ABUSE, REWARD COMPARISON, AND THE THALAMUSR01DA012473 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 2000 to 2010
$2.9M
DRUGS OF ABUSE AND LEARNED AVERSIONS: SOLVING A PARADOXR01DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 1996 to 2011
$2.3M
Role of the Trigeminal Orosensory Area of the Thalamus in Natural and Drug RewardF31DA029369 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI NYLAND, JENNIFER E. · 2011 to 2012
$50k
NIDA NIH HHS DA 012473NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA029369NIDA NIH HHS F31-DA 029369NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009815NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance abuse and addiction are associated with an apparent devaluation of, and inattention to, natural rewards. This consequence of addiction can be modeled using a reward comparison paradigm where rats avoid intake of a palatable taste cue that comes to predict access to a drug of abuse. Evidence suggests rats avoid intake following such pairings, at least in part, because the taste cue pales in comparison to the highly rewarding drug expected in the near future. In accordance, lesions of the gustatory thalamus or cortex eliminate avoidance of a taste cue when paired with either a drug of abuse or a rewarding sucrose solution, but not when paired with the aversive agent, LiCl. The present study used bilateral ibotenic acid lesions to evaluate the role of a neighboring thalamic structure, the trigeminal orosensory area (TOA), in avoidance of a gustatory cue when paired with sucrose (experiment 1), morphine (experiment 2), cocaine (experiment 3), or LiCl (experiment 4). The results show that the TOA lesion disrupts, but does not eliminate avoidance of a taste cue that predicts access to a preferred sucrose solution and leaves intact the development of a LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion. The lesion does, however, eliminate the suppression of intake of a taste cue when paired with experimenter-administered morphine or cocaine using our standard parameters. As such, this is the first manipulation found to dissociate avoidance of a taste cue when mediated by a sweet or by a drug of abuse.

Indexed as

RewardAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAntimanic AgentsAssociation LearningAvoidance LearningCocaineConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantDopamine Uptake InhibitorsEatingExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsFood PreferencesIbotenic AcidLithium ChlorideMaleAntimanic AgentsCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsIbotenic AcidLithium ChlorideMorphineSaccharin

Identifiers

PMID22687147
PMCPMC3409304
OpenAlexW1972549166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.