Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22686617›Full record

ReviewDrugs2012

Bilastine: in allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

Natalie J Carter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02513290 (Quality of Life in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02513290 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Quality of Life in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis: a Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Bilastine Versus Loratadine

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do Sul de Santa CatarinaRan2013 to 2014Enrolled73ConditionsAllergic RhinitisArmsBilastine, Loratadine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ocular Biodistribution of Once-Daily 0.6% Bilastine Eye Drops Reveals Highest Levels in Conjunctiva Up to 24 h Postadministration.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Natalie J CarterAdis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@springer.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bilastine is an orally administered, second-generation antihistamine used in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal or perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. In two well designed phase III trials, 14 days' treatment with bilastine was associated with a significantly lower area under the effect curve (AUEC) for the reflective total symptom score (TSS) than placebo in patients with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally, reflective nasal symptom scores were significantly lower in bilastine than placebo recipients in patients with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis who were challenged with grass pollen allergen in a single-centre, phase II study. Neither bilastine nor cetirizine was effective in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis with regard to the mean AUEC for reflective TSS in another well designed phase III trial. However, results may have been altered by differences in some baseline characteristics and placebo responses between study countries. In another well designed phase III trial, compared with placebo, bilastine was associated with a significantly greater change from baseline to day 28 in the mean reflective daily urticaria symptom score in patients with chronic urticaria. There were no significant differences in primary endpoint results between bilastine and any of the active comparators used in these trials (i.e. cetirizine, levocetirizine and desloratadine). Bilastine was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile that was generally similar to that of the other second-generation antihistamines included in phase III clinical trials.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBenzimidazolesCetirizineHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingHumansLoratadinePiperidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialUrticariaBenzimidazolesbilastineCetirizinedesloratadineHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatinglevocetirizineLoratadinePiperidines

Identifiers

PMID22686617
OpenAlexW2330774372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.