ArticleInternational journal of speech-language pathology2012
Intensity in phonological intervention: is there a prescribed amount?
Article in International journal of speech-language pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03972891 (Influence of a Intervention Break on a Treated Phonological Process in Spontaneous Speech Situations in Children Aged 5 to 6 Years With Phonologically Delayed Development), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Influence of a Intervention Break on a Treated Phonological Process in Spontaneous Speech Situations in Children Aged 5 to 6 Years With Phonologically Delayed Development
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in children with neurological impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Speech in Ten-Minute Sessions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Chaining SPLITS Service Delivery Model.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025Trial
- Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2017Trial
- Review
- Article
- Aligned or misaligned: Are public funding models for speech-language pathology reflecting recommended evidence? An exploratory survey of Australian speech-language pathologists.Health policy OPEN · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Voice and Articulation Parameters of a Home-Based Serious Game for Speech Therapy in Children With Articulation Disorder: Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial.JMIR serious games · 2023Article
- Applying evidence to practice by increasing intensity of intervention for children with severe speech sound disorder: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- The Effectiveness of an Integrated Treatment for Functional Speech Sound Disorders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparing Feedback Types in Multimedia Learning of Speech by Young Children With Common Speech Sound Disorders: Research Protocol for a Pretest Posttest Independent Measures Control Trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Defining the Level of Need and Total Intervention Time in Children's Speech and Language Therapy in Finland: Developing a Consensus-Based Guideline.Autism & developmental language impairmentsArticle
- Protocol for a Systematic Review of Interventions Not Delivered by Speech and Language Therapists for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a number of studies that have demonstrated positive outcomes for inducing clinical change in children with speech sound disorders (SSD), there is a need to address the question of whether resources are being applied in an optimal manner. As a consequence, there has been a call to look within interventions to examine parameters that may contribute to intervention outcomes; specifically the intensity of intervention (dose, frequency, duration, and cumulative intervention intensity). In this paper, empirical evidence from three intervention studies using multiple oppositions primarily, and a second contrastive approach, minimal pairs, is reported with regard to the parameters of intervention intensity. The findings indicated that greater intensity yields greater treatment outcomes. Further, quantitative and qualitative changes in intensity occur as intervention progresses, and there were differences in intensity based on severity of the SSD. Based on these data, suggestions were made toward establishing some prescribed amounts of intensity to affect treatment outcomes for children with SSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22686582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.