Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22685493›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2012

Perioperative point of care coagulation testing.

Christian Friedrich Weber, Kai Zacharowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01826123 (Point-of-Care Testing - A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study of Efficacy in Coagulopathic Cardiac Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01826123 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Point-of-Care Testing - A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study of Efficacy in Coagulopathic Cardiac Surgery Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorGoethe UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled160ConditionsCoagulopathy During Cardiac SurgeryArmsConventional laboratory testing (Central laboratory), POC testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rotational Thromboelastometry for Assessing Bleeding Complications and Factor XIII Deficiency in Cardiac Surgery Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Observational
  4. The state of point-of-care testing: a European perspective.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2015
    Review
  5. Perioperative blood management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2014
    Review
  6. Perioperative coagulopathy monitoring.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2014
    Review
  7. [Point-of-care-based hemotherapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2013
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Friedrich WeberClinic of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Christian.Weber@kgu.de
Kai Zacharowski
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional laboratory tests of blood coagulation yield only partial diagnostic information. "Point of care" (POC) devices are increasingly being used at the bedside perioperatively for rapid, detailed testing of hemostatic function and for treatment monitoring in patients with coagulopathies. In this review, we discuss the benefits and limitations of POC coagulation testing-in particular, its effects on the rate of perioperative transfusion of allogeneic blood products, on the frequency of other types of hemostatic treatment, and on the clinical outcome.

methodsThis article is based on a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a search in PubMed.

resultsThe clinical value of preoperative POC screening for coagulopathies has not yet been examined in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. On the other hand, studies in patients with coagulopathies undergoing (mainly cardiac) surgery have shown that algorithm-based hemostatic treatment based on viscoelastic POC coagulation testing reduces both perioperative blood loss and the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood products. None of the studies published to date had adequate power to reveal any independent effect of POC coagulation testing on perioperative morbidity or mortality.

conclusionDespite certain limitations that must be borne in mind, POC techniques are a valuable means of testing various aspects of hemostasis rapidly and in detail. Their implementation in hemostatic treatment algorithms may reduce both the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood products and the total cost of treatment for blood loss and coagulopathies. The putative effect of POC testing on perioperative morbidity and mortality has not yet been demonstrated.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineBlood Coagulation DisordersBlood Coagulation TestsHumansPerioperative CarePoint-of-Care Systems

Identifiers

PMID22685493
PMCPMC3370380
OpenAlexW2166217548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.