ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Limits to the rate of adaptive substitution in sexual populations.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- A model of Hill-Robertson interference caused by purifying selection in a nonrecombining genome.Genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Human deleterious mutation rate slows adaptation and implies high fitness variance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Selection Can Favor a Recombination Landscape That Limits Polygenic Adaptation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Population genomic insights into invasion success in a polyphagous agricultural pest, Halyomorpha halys.Molecular ecology · 2023Article
- Article
- Reproductive isolation via polygenic local adaptation in sub-divided populations: Effect of linkage disequilibria and drift.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- How Can We Resolve Lewontin's Paradox?Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Soft selective sweeps: Addressing new definitions, evaluating competing models, and interpreting empirical outliers.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Evolution of resistance under alternative models of selective interference.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Detecting selected haplotype blocks in evolve and resequence experiments.Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
- How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?Genetics · 2020Article
- Is adaptation limited by mutation? A timescale-dependent effect of genetic diversity on the adaptive substitution rate in animals.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Survival of the simplest in microbial evolution.Nature communications · 2019Article
- An integrative genomic analysis of the Longshanks selection experiment for longer limbs in mice.eLife · 2019Article
- The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.Genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In large populations, many beneficial mutations may be simultaneously available and may compete with one another, slowing adaptation. By finding the probability of fixation of a favorable allele in a simple model of a haploid sexual population, we find limits to the rate of adaptive substitution, Λ, that depend on simple parameter combinations. When variance in fitness is low and linkage is loose, the baseline rate of substitution is Λ₀ = 2NU <s>, where N is the population size, U is the rate of beneficial mutations per genome, and <s> is their mean selective advantage. Heritable variance v in log fitness due to unlinked loci reduces Λ by e⁻⁴(v) under polygamy and e⁻⁸ (v) under monogamy. With a linear genetic map of length R Morgans, interference is yet stronger. We use a scaling argument to show that the density of adaptive substitutions depends on s, N, U, and R only through the baseline density: Λ/R = F (Λ₀/R). Under the approximation that the interference due to different sweeps adds up, we show that Λ/R ~(Λ₀/R) / (1 +2Λ₉/R) , implying that interference prevents the rate of adaptive substitution from exceeding one per centimorgan per 200 generations. Simulations and numerical calculations confirm the scaling argument and confirm the additive approximation for Λ₀/R ~ 1; for higher Λ₀/R , the rate of adaptation grows above R/2, but only very slowly. We also consider the effect of sweeps on neutral diversity and show that, while even occasional sweeps can greatly reduce neutral diversity, this effect saturates as sweeps become more common-diversity can be maintained even in populations experiencing very strong interference. Our results indicate that for some organisms the rate of adaptive substitution may be primarily recombination-limited, depending only weakly on the mutation supply and the strength of selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.