Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22685418›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Uracil-containing DNA in Drosophila: stability, stage-specific accumulation, and developmental involvement.

Villő Muha, András Horváth, Angéla Békési, Mária Pukáncsik, Barbara Hodoscsek, Gábor Merényi, Gergely Róna, Júlia Batki, István Kiss, Ferenc Jankovics and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Detection of Genomic Uracil Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Villő MuhaInstitute of Enzymology, Research Center for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest, Hungary.
András Horváth
Angéla Békési
Mária Pukáncsik
Barbara Hodoscsek
Gábor Merényi
Gergely Róna
Júlia Batki
István Kiss
Ferenc Jankovics
Péter Vilmos
Miklós Erdélyi
Beáta G Vértessy
Institute of Molecular Life Sciences · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HU

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55000342Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55005628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base-excision repair and control of nucleotide pools safe-guard against permanent uracil accumulation in DNA relying on two key enzymes: uracil-DNA glycosylase and dUTPase. Lack of the major uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG gene from the fruit fly genome and dUTPase from fruit fly larvae prompted the hypotheses that i) uracil may accumulate in Drosophila genomic DNA where it may be well tolerated, and ii) this accumulation may affect development. Here we show that i) Drosophila melanogaster tolerates high levels of uracil in DNA; ii) such DNA is correctly interpreted in cell culture and embryo; and iii) under physiological spatio-temporal control, DNA from fruit fly larvae, pupae, and imago contain greatly elevated levels of uracil (200-2,000 uracil/million bases, quantified using a novel real-time PCR-based assay). Uracil is accumulated in genomic DNA of larval tissues during larval development, whereas DNA from imaginal tissues contains much less uracil. Upon pupation and metamorphosis, uracil content in DNA is significantly decreased. We propose that the observed developmental pattern of uracil-DNA is due to the lack of the key repair enzyme UNG from the Drosophila genome together with down-regulation of dUTPase in larval tissues. In agreement, we show that dUTPase silencing increases the uracil content in DNA of imaginal tissues and induces strong lethality at the early pupal stages, indicating that tolerance of highly uracil-substituted DNA is also stage-specific. Silencing of dUTPase perturbs the physiological pattern of uracil-DNA accumulation in Drosophila and leads to a strongly lethal phenotype in early pupal stages. These findings suggest a novel role of uracil-containing DNA in Drosophila development and metamorphosis and present a novel example for developmental effects of dUTPase silencing in multicellular eukaryotes. Importantly, we also show lack of the UNG gene in all available genomes of other Holometabola insects, indicating a potentially general tolerance and developmental role of uracil-DNA in this evolutionary clade.

Indexed as

PyrophosphatasesUracilAnimalsCell LineDNADrosophila melanogasterGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome, InsectGenomic InstabilityHeLa CellsHumansLarvaRNA InterferenceUracil-DNA GlycosidaseDNAdUTP pyrophosphatasePyrophosphatasesUracilUracil-DNA Glycosidase

Identifiers

PMID22685418
PMCPMC3369950
OpenAlexW2115698515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.