Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22685075›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

Performance of computational tools in evaluating the functional impact of laboratory-induced amino acid mutations.

Vanessa E Gray, Kimberly R Kukurba, Sudhir Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rheostatic contributions to protein stability can obscure a position's functional role.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rheostat positions: A new classification of protein positions relevant to pharmacogenomics.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2020
    Article
  7. A Novel Missense Mutation in Human Receptor Roundabout-1Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical exome sequencing in neurologic disease.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2016
    Review
  19. Clinical exome sequencing in neurogenetic and neuropsychiatric disorders.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanessa E GrayCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Kimberly R Kukurba
Sudhir Kumar
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Arizona State University PREP for Biomedical ResearchR25GM071798 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI HOGUE, BRENDA G. · 2004 to 2014
$2.4M
Evolutionary Bioinformatics of Human MutationsR01LM010834 · NLM · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM071798NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM071798NLM NIH HHS LM10834NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis is frequently used by scientists to investigate the functional impact of amino acid mutations in the laboratory. Over 10,000 such laboratory-induced mutations have been reported in the UniProt database along with the outcomes of functional assays. Here, we explore the performance of state-of-the-art computational tools (Condel, PolyPhen-2 and SIFT) in correctly annotating the function-altering potential of 10,913 laboratory-induced mutations from 2372 proteins. We find that computational tools are very successful in diagnosing laboratory-induced mutations that elicit significant functional change in the laboratory (up to 92% accuracy). But, these tools consistently fail in correctly annotating laboratory-induced mutations that show no functional impact in the laboratory assays. Therefore, the overall accuracy of computational tools for laboratory-induced mutations is much lower than that observed for the naturally occurring human variants. We tested and rejected the possibilities that the preponderance of changes to alanine and the presence of multiple base-pair mutations in the laboratory were the reasons for the observed discordance between the performance of computational tools for natural and laboratory mutations. Instead, we discover that the laboratory-induced mutations occur predominately at the highly conserved positions in proteins, where the computational tools have the lowest accuracy of correct prediction for variants that do not impact function (neutral). Therefore, the comparisons of experimental-profiling results with those from computational predictions need to be sensitive to the evolutionary conservation of the positions harboring the amino acid change.

Indexed as

MutationSoftwareAmino AcidsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProteinsAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22685075
PMCPMC3413386
OpenAlexW2131220338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.