Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22684657›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2013

Recruiting drug using men who have sex with men in behavioral intervention trials: a comparison of internet and field-based strategies.

Jeffrey T Parsons, Andrea C Vial, Tyrel J Starks, Sarit A Golub

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey T ParsonsDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, NY, USA. jeffrey.parsons@hunter.cuny.edu
Andrea C Vial
Tyrel J Starks
Sarit A Golub
City University of New York · USHunter College · US

Funding

Intervention Targeting Medication Adherence and Methamphetamine Use for HIV + MenR01DA023395 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, JEFFREY T · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Risk Reduction Intervention for Highly Vulnerable Emerging Adults MalesR01DA020366 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, JEFFREY T · 2006 to 2010
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020366NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although online and field-based samples of men who have sex with men (MSM) have been compared on a variety of markers, differences in drug use have not been well examined. In addition, generalization from studies comparing recruitment methods is often limited by a focus on either HIV seropositive or seronegative MSM. We compared two New York City-based samples of MSM recruited simultaneously between July 2009 and January 2010-one sample recruited in the field (n = 2,402) and one sample recruited via the Internet (n = 694). All recruitment efforts targeted men without restriction on age or self-reported HIV status. Our results show marked differences in drug and alcohol use between online and field-based samples of MSM. Specifically, men surveyed online were significantly more likely to have tried a variety of drugs, including methamphetamine, cocaine, and ecstasy. Men recruited online were also more likely to report older age, HIV positive serostatus, and "never" using condoms. Internet-based recruitment was found to be more cost-effective in terms of recruitment yield than was field-based recruitment.

Indexed as

InternetAdolescentAdultCondomsDrug UsersHealth SurveysHIV SeropositivityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPatient SelectionSelf CareSexual BehaviorSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID22684657
PMCPMC3463716
OpenAlexW1986793612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.