Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22684367›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2012

Genomics screens for metastasis genes.

Jinchun Yan, Qihong Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Long non-coding RNAs involved in different steps of cancer metastasis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genetics of metastasis: melanoma and other cancers.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Frequent chromosomal aberrations and candidate genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinchun YanUniversity of Washington Medical Center, 1959 N. E. Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. jyan@u.washington.edu
Qihong Huang

Funding

Defining the Molecular Mechanisms of KLF17 Regulation and Function in EMTR01CA148759 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI HUANG, QIHONG · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148759NCI NIH HHS R01CA148759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis is responsible for most cancer mortality. The process of metastasis is complex, requiring the coordinated expression and fine regulation of many genes in multiple pathways in both the tumor and host tissues. Identification and characterization of the genetic programs that regulate metastasis is critical to understanding the metastatic process and discovering molecular targets for the prevention and treatment of metastasis. Genomic approaches and functional genomic analyses can systemically discover metastasis genes. In this review, we summarize the genetic tools and methods that have been used to identify and characterize the genes that play critical roles in metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytogeneticsGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryGenomicsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociRNA Interference

Identifiers

PMID22684367
PMCPMC4071451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.