Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22684311›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Molecular engineering of antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

Frédéric Ducancel, Bruno H Muller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advancements in antibody-drug conjugates as cancer therapeutics.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DOTAD: A Database of Therapeutic Antibody Developability.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Monoclonal neutralizing antibodies against SARS-COV-2 S protein.American journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frédéric DucancelCEA, iBiTec-S, Department of Pharmacology and Immunoanalysis, Laboratory of Antibody Engineering for Health, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. frederic.ducancel@cea.fr
Bruno H Muller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past ten years, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have taken center stage in the field of targeted therapy and diagnosis. This increased interest in mAbs is due to their binding accuracy (affinity and specificity) together with the original molecular and structural rules that govern interactions with their cognate antigen. In addition, the effector properties of antibodies constitute a second major advantage associated with their clinical use. The development of molecular and structural engineering and more recently of in vitro evolution of antibodies has opened up new perspectives in the de novo design of antibodies more adapted to clinical and diagnostic use. Thus, efforts are regularly made by researchers to improve or modulate antibody recognition properties, to adapt their pharmacokinetics, engineer their stability, and control their immunogenicity. This review presents the latest molecular engineering results on mAbs with therapeutic and diagnostic applications.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DesignAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsProtein EngineeringAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID22684311
PMCPMC3499339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.