Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22683541›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2012

Biomarkers of eosinophil involvement in allergic and eosinophilic diseases: review of phenotypic and serum markers including a novel assay to quantify levels of soluble Siglec-8.

Ho Jeong Na, Robert G Hamilton, Amy D Klion, Bruce S Bochner

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. First Evidence for a Role of Siglec-8 in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Eosinophilic bioactivities in severe asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2016
    Review
  16. Novel Therapies for Eosinophilic Disorders.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  17. Novel targeted therapies for eosinophil-associated diseases and allergy.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2015
    Review
  18. Activation states of blood eosinophils in asthma.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Biologic therapies targeting eosinophils: current status and future prospects.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ho Jeong NaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert G Hamilton
Amy D Klion
Bruce S Bochner
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Eosinophils and Eosinophil Activation in the Pathogenesis of Human DiseaseZIAAI001130 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI KLION, AMY · 2010 to 2025
$22.5M
Treating lung inflammation by targeting SiglecsP01HL107151 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNAAR, RONALD L · 2011 to 2017
$15.4M
Targeting Siglec-8/Siglec-F Reduce Allergic Responses In Vitro and In VivoR01AI072265 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
Targeting Siglec-8/-F to treat eosinophil and mast cell related disordersR56AI072265 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2012 to 2012
$405k
Intramural NIH HHSNHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL107151NIAID NIH HHS AI72265NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There remains considerable controversy in the management of eosinophilic disorders, mainly due to a paucity of information regarding the clinical interpretation of total blood eosinophil counts versus surface activation markers versus eosinophil-derived or eosinophil-influencing mediator levels. Regrettably, few tests have been validated that define a unique clinical or prognostic phenotype that is more useful than simply monitoring total blood eosinophil counts. In this manuscript, phenotypic (cell surface) markers, along with serum and tissue-based markers that have been examined in the context of disease activity, are reviewed. We also report the development of a novel assay for detecting soluble Siglec-8 (sSiglec-8), a protein likely derived largely from eosinophils, as a potential serum biomarker. The assay consists of a competitive ELISA using a recombinant Siglec-8-Fc fusion protein. The goal of this preliminary study was to determine if sSiglec-8 is a useful biomarker that differentiates among patients with various eosinophil-associated diseases. In the final analysis, it is fair to say that further research is sorely needed to fully understand and validate the utility of various biomarkers, including sSiglec-8, before their use in clinical practice can be recommended with confidence.

Indexed as

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCell SeparationDiagnosis, DifferentialEosinophiliaEosinophilsHumansHypersensitivityLectinsMarylandPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteBiomarkersLectinsSIGLEC8 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22683541
PMCPMC3411856
OpenAlexW2162294621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.