Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22683415›Full record

ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2012

Understanding vaginal microbiome complexity from an ecological perspective.

Roxana J Hickey, Xia Zhou, Jacob D Pierson, Jacques Ravel, Larry J Forney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparative phase I randomized open-label pilot clinical trial of GynophilusEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Progress in interventions for vaginal microecology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roxana J HickeyInstitute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies-IBEST, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Xia Zhou
Jacob D Pierson
Jacques Ravel
Larry J Forney
University of Idaho · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Genomic Tools For Studying The Ecology Of The Human Vaginal MicrofloraU01AI070921 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI RAVEL, JACQUES · 2006 to 2010
$4.0M
The Microbial Ecology of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Fine Scale Resolution MetagenomicUH2AI083264 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI RAVEL, JACQUES · 2009 to 2011
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070921NIAID NIH HHS UH2 AI083264NIAID NIH HHS UO1 AI070921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The various microbiota normally associated with the human body have an important influence on human development, physiology, immunity, and nutrition. This is certainly true for the vagina wherein communities of mutualistic bacteria constitute the first line of defense for the host by excluding invasive, nonindigenous organisms that may cause disease. In recent years much has been learned about the bacterial species composition of these communities and how they differ between individuals of different ages and ethnicities. A deeper understanding of their origins and the interrelationships of constituent species is needed to understand how and why they change over time or in response to changes in the host environment. Moreover, there are few unifying theories to explain the ecological dynamics of vaginal ecosystems as they respond to disturbances caused by menses and human activities such as intercourse, douching, and other habits and practices. This fundamental knowledge is needed to diagnose and assess risk to disease. Here we summarize what is known about the species composition, structure, and function of bacterial communities in the human vagina and the applicability of ecological models of community structure and function to understanding the dynamics of this and other ecosystems that comprise the human microbiome.

Indexed as

AgingBacteriaEthnicityFemaleHumansVaginaVaginosis, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22683415
PMCPMC3444549
OpenAlexW2154548310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.