Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22682988›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia research2012

Computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: a randomized single-blind pilot study.

Olga Rass, Jennifer K Forsyth, Amanda R Bolbecker, William P Hetrick, Alan Breier, Paul H Lysaker, Brian F O'Donnell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantifying the Difference between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using two Meta-Analytical Approaches.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olga RassDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. rasso@indiana.edu
Jennifer K Forsyth
Amanda R Bolbecker
William P Hetrick
Alan Breier
Paul H Lysaker
Brian F O'Donnell

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000006 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2012 to 2013
$5.6M
Cerebellar timing dysfunction in schizophreniaR01MH074983 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2006 to 2016
$3.6M
INTEGRATIVE PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCH AT INDIANA UNIVERSITYT32DA024628 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrea Grace Hohmann, Kenneth Mackie · 2008 to 2026
$3.1M
Visual Processing in Schizophrenia and SPDR01MH062150 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONNELL, BRIAN FRANCIS · 2001 to 2009
$1.6M
Neural Oscillations in Schizophrenia and a Rat ModelR21MH091774 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONNELL, BRIAN FRANCIS · 2010 to 2011
$421k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000006NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCRR NIH HHS RR025761NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024628NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024628-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062150NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074983NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH62150NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH091774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is a core symptom in schizophrenia that has a significant impact on psychosocial function, but shows a weak response to pharmacological treatment. Consequently, a variety of cognitive remediation strategies have been evaluated to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia. The efficacy of computer-based cognitive remediation as a stand-alone intervention on general measures of neuropsychological function remains unclear. We tested the effectiveness of biweekly training using computerized cognitive remediation programs on neuropsychological and event-related potential outcome measures. Schizophrenia patients were randomly assigned to cognitive remediation training (N=17), active control (TV-watching; N=17), or treatment-as-usual (N=10) groups for ten weeks and run in parallel. Cognitive and ERP measures revealed no differential improvement over time in the cognitive remediation group. Practice effects might explain change over time on several cognitive measures for all groups, consistent with studies indicating task-specific improvement. Computer-assisted cognitive remediation alone may not be sufficient for robust or generalized effects on cognitive and electrophysiological measures in schizophrenia patients.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyTherapy, Computer-AssistedAcoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceCognition DisordersElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNegotiatingNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID22682988
PMCPMC3393784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.