Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22682911›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2012

Early adversity and neural correlates of executive function: implications for academic adjustment.

Jennifer M McDermott, Alissa Westerlund, Charles H Zeanah, Charles A Nelson, Nathan A Fox

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02684903 (Coaching Alternative Parenting Strategies), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02684903 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Coaching Alternative Parenting Strategies (CAPS) Study: Targeting Neurobiological and Behavioral Mechanisms of Self-regulation in High-risk Families

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2016 to 2022Enrolled408ConditionsChild Abuse, Self-control, ParentingArmsParent Child Interaction Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Long-term effects of institutional rearing, foster care, and brain activity on memory and executive functioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Age-related no-go P300 amplitudes are moderated by exposure to early-life stress.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer M McDermottDepartment of Psychology, Tobin Hall, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, United States. mcdermott@pysch.umass.edu
Alissa Westerlund
Charles H Zeanah
Charles A Nelson
Nathan A Fox

Funding

The Relation Between Early Psychosocial Deprivation and Mental Health at 12 YearsR01MH091363 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOX, NATHAN A, NELSON, CHARLES ALEXANDER · 2010 to 2024
$9.2M
NIMH NIH HHS 1R01MH091363NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early adversity can negatively impact the development of cognitive functions, although little is known about whether such effects can be remediated later in life. The current study examined one facet of executive functioning - inhibitory control - among children who experienced institutional care and explored the impact of a foster care intervention within the context of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP). Specifically, a go/nogo task was administered when children were eight years old and behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures were collected. Results revealed that children assigned to care as usual (i.e. institutional care) were less accurate and exhibited slower neural responses compared to children assigned to the foster care intervention and children who had never been institutionalized. However, children in both the care as usual and foster care groups exhibited diminished attention processing of nogo cues as assessed via P300 amplitude. Foster care children also showed differential reactivity between correct and error responses via the error-related negativity (ERN) as compared to children in the care as usual group. Combined, the results highlight perturbations in neural sources of behavioral and attention problems among children experiencing early adversity. Potential implications for academic adjustment in at risk children are discussed.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAnalysis of VarianceChildChild, InstitutionalizedEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionFemaleFoster Home CareHumansIntelligenceMaleReaction TimeSocial AdjustmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22682911
PMCPMC3408020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.