ArticleSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2012
Robust assessment of spatial non-stationarity in model associations related to pediatric mortality due to diarrheal disease in Brazil.
Article in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts of Social Environments on Neighborhood Depression Incidence: Fully Accounting for Spatial Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- The importance of regional models in assessing canine cancer incidences in Switzerland.PloS one · 2018Article
- Socio-environmental factors and diarrheal diseases in under five-year old children in the state of Tocantins, Brazil.PloS one · 2018Article
- Micro-spatial distribution of malaria cases and control strategies at ward level in Gwanda district, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe.Malaria journal · 2017Article
- Micro-epidemiology and spatial heterogeneity of P. vivax parasitaemia in riverine communities of the Peruvian Amazon: A multilevel analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Understanding the combined impacts of aggregation and spatial non-stationarity: The case of migration-environment associations in rural South Africa.Transactions in GIS : TG · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 1.5 million people, mostly children, die annually due to disease attributed to diarrhea reflecting urgent needs for improved understanding of associations between the disease and potential risk factors. Numerous epidemiological studies found spatially varying (non-stationary) disease associations attributable to changing geographic or demographic context. Spatial non-stationarity implies that average relationships from statistical models fitted to the whole study area might be inappropriate since they do not reflect local conditions. Spatial modeling techniques such as geographically weighted regression (GWR) have limitations in providing statistically robust analysis of spatial non-stationarity. Thus, there is a need for development or expansion of modeling techniques to address this issue. Using data for pediatric diarrheal mortality in Brazil in 2000, and different risk factors, we develop an analytical framework to determine regions of similar (stationary) local associations by combining GWR and max-p regionalization. We fit statistical models to these regions, and compare goodness-of-fit and regionally varying coefficients to the national-scale model measures. The proposed framework allows us to examine (a) impact of non-stationarity for regions of different geographic extent with acceptable statistical power, (b) the explanatory power of each risk factor in each region, and (c) if these regions reflect changing data quality or truly existing variations in putative associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.