Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22682323›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

Influence of macrolide maintenance therapy and bacterial colonisation on exacerbation frequency and progression of COPD (COLUMBUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sevim Uzun, Remco S Djamin, Janajw Kluytmans, Nils E Van't Veer, Anton A M Ermens, Aline J Pelle, Paul Mulder, Menno M van der Eerden, Joachimgjv Aerts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00985244 (Influence of Macrolide Maintenance Therapy and Bacterial Colonisation on Exacerbation Frequency and Progression of COPD, a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00985244 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Macrolide Maintenance Therapy and Bacterial Colonisation on Exacerbation Frequency and Progression of COPD, a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorR.S. DjaminRan2010 to 2013Enrolled92ConditionsCOPDArmsAzithromycin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Clinically relevant subgroups in COPD and asthma.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sevim UzunDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands.
Remco S Djamin
Janajw Kluytmans
Nils E Van't Veer
Anton A M Ermens
Aline J Pelle
Paul Mulder
Menno M van der Eerden
Joachimgjv Aerts
Amphia Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive development of airflow limitation that is poorly reversible. Because of a poor understanding of COPD pathogenesis, treatment is mostly symptomatic and new therapeutic strategies are limited. There is a direct relationship between the severity of the disease and the intensity of the inflammatory response. Besides smoking, one of the hypotheses for the persistent airway inflammation is the presence of recurrent infections. Macrolide antibiotics have bacteriostatic as well as anti-inflammatory properties in patients with cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory pulmonary diseases. There is consistent evidence that macrolide therapy reduces infectious exacerbations, decreases the requirement for additional antibiotics and improves nutritional measures. Because of these positive effects we hypothesised that maintenance macrolide therapy may also have beneficial effects in patients with COPD who have recurrent exacerbations. The effects on development of bacterial resistance to macrolides due to this long-term treatment are unknown. Until now, studies investigating macrolide therapy in COPD are limited. The objective of this study is to assess whether maintenance treatment with macrolide antibiotics in COPD patients with three or more exacerbations in the previous year decreases the exacerbation rate in the year of treatment and to establish microbial resistance due to the long-term treatment. METHODS/

designThe study is set up as a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled single-centre trial. A total of 92 patients with COPD who have had at least three exacerbations of COPD in the previous year will be included. Subjects will be randomised to receive either azithromycin 500 mg three times a week or placebo. Our primary endpoint is the reduction in the number of exacerbations of COPD in the year of treatment. DISCUSSION: We investigate whether long-term therapy with macrolide antibiotics can prevent exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, our study aims to assess the effect of long-term use of macrolide on the development of antimicrobial resistance and on inflammatory parameters related to COPD. We believe this study will provide more data on the effects of macrolide treatment in patients in COPD and will add more knowledge on its working mechanisms.

trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00985244.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansLungNetherlandsProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Tract InfectionsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID22682323
PMCPMC3478173
OpenAlexW2146747021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.