Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22682298›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2012

Health coaching by telephony to support self-care in chronic diseases: clinical outcomes from The TERVA randomized controlled trial.

Kristiina Patja, Pilvikki Absetz, Anssi Auvinen, Kari Tokola, Janne Kytö, Erja Oksman, Risto Kuronen, Timo Ovaska, Kari Harno, Mikko Nenonen and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00552903 (Randomised Trial of Health Coaching in Secondary Prevention of Diabetes and Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00552903 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomised Trial of Health Coaching in Secondary Prevention of Diabetes and Heart Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorPaijat-Hame Hospital DistrictRan2007 to 2010Enrolled1,500ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Heart Failure, Coronary DiseaseArmsHealth coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. mHealth education interventions in heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Disease management interventions for heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristiina PatjaNational Institute of Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. Kristiina.patja@promedico.fi
Pilvikki Absetz
Anssi Auvinen
Kari Tokola
Janne Kytö
Erja Oksman
Risto Kuronen
Timo Ovaska
Kari Harno
Mikko Nenonen
Tom Wiklund
Raimo Kettunen
Martti Talja
Päijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to evaluate the effect of a 12-month individualized health coaching intervention by telephony on clinical outcomes.

methodsAn open-label cluster-randomized parallel groups trial. Pre- and post-intervention anthropometric and blood pressure measurements by trained nurses, laboratory measures from electronic medical records (EMR). A total of 2594 patients filling inclusion criteria (age 45 years or older, with type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, and unmet treatment goals) were identified from EMRs, and 1535 patients (59%) gave consent and were randomized into intervention or control arm. Final analysis included 1221 (80%) participants with data on primary end-points both at entry and at end. Primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum total and LDL cholesterol concentration, waist circumference for all patients, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for diabetics and NYHA class in patients with congestive heart failure. The target effect was defined as a 10-percentage point increase in the proportion of patients reaching the treatment goal in the intervention arm.

resultsThe proportion of patients with diastolic blood pressure initially above the target level decreasing to 85 mmHg or lower was 48% in the intervention arm and 37% in the control arm (difference 10.8%, 95% confidence interval 1.5-19.7%). No significant differences emerged between the arms in the other primary end-points. However, the target levels of systolic blood pressure and waist circumference were reached non-significantly more frequently in the intervention arm.

conclusionsIndividualized health coaching by telephony, as implemented in the trial was unable to achieve majority of the disease management clinical measures. To provide substantial benefits, interventions may need to be more intensive, target specific sub-groups, and/or to be fully integrated into local health care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00552903.

Indexed as

Self CareTelephoneAgedBlood PressureCholesterolCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFinlandGlycated HemoglobinHealth PromotionHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCholesterolGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID22682298
PMCPMC3502505
OpenAlexW2097718739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.