Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22682059›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hematology & oncology2012

Administration of imatinib after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may improve disease-free survival for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphobla stic leukemia.

Huan Chen, Kai-yan Liu, Lan-ping Xu, Dai-hong Liu, Yu-hong Chen, Xiang-yu Zhao, Wei Han, Xiao-hui Zhang, Yu Wang, Yuan-yuan Zhang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. MRD in ALL: Optimization and Innovations.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huan ChenPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, PR China.
Kai-yan Liu
Lan-ping Xu
Dai-hong Liu
Yu-hong Chen
Xiang-yu Zhao
Wei Han
Xiao-hui Zhang
Yu Wang
Yuan-yuan Zhang
Ya-zhen Qin
Yan-rong Liu
Xiao-jun Huang
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance therapy with imatinib during the post-transplant period has been used for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL); however, its efficacy has not been demonstrated. A study was designed to investigate the safety of imatinib and its efficacy in preventing hematological relapse and improving disease-free survival (DFS) when administered after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT).

methodsPatients with Ph + ALL that received allo-HCT were enrolled in the study. Real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to detect BCR-ABL transcript levels. Imatinib therapy was initiated if patient neutrophil counts were > 1.0 × 10(9)/L and platelet counts were > 50.0 × 10(9)/L, or if they displayed either elevated BCR-ABL transcript levels in two consecutive tests, or a BCR-ABL transcript level ≥ 10(-2) after initial engraftment. Patients receiving imatinib after relapse were assigned to the non-imatinib group. The imatinib treatment was scheduled for 3-12 months, until BCR-ABL transcript levels were negative at least for three consecutive tests or complete molecular remission was sustained for at least 3 months.

resultsA total of 82 patients were enrolled. Sixty-two patients initiated imatinib therapy post-HCT. Imatinib therapy was initiated at a median time of 70 days post-HCT. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.7% of patients. Ten patients (16.1%) terminated imatinib therapy owing to AEs. Among the patients in imatinib and non-imatinib groups, the estimated 5-year relapse rate was 10.2% and 33.1% (p = 0.016), and the 5-year probability of DFS was 81.5% and 33.5% (p = 0.000) with the median follow-up of 31 months (range, 2.5-76 months) and 24.5 months (range, 4-72 months), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified imatinib maintenance therapy post-HCT as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.000, hazard ratio [HR] =4.8) and OS (p = 0.000, HR = 6.2).

conclusionsThese results indicate that relapse rate can be reduced and DFS may be improved in Ph + ALL patients with imatinib maintenance therapy after HCT. BCR-ABLmonitoring by qRT-PCR can guide maintenance therapy with imatinib including initiation time and treatment duration after allo-HCT.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPhiladelphia ChromosomeAdolescentAdultBenzamidesChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID22682059
PMCPMC3407007
OpenAlexW2132429302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.