Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22681857›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2012

Health status, quality of life, and satisfaction of patients awaiting multidisciplinary bariatric care.

Raj S Padwal, Sumit R Majumdar, Scott Klarenbach, Daniel W Birch, Shahzeer Karmali, Linda McCargar, Konrad Fassbender, Arya M Sharma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00850356 (Alberta Population-based, Prospective Evaluation of the Quality of Life Outcomes and Economic Impacts of Bariatric Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00850356 completednot on this map

Alberta Population-based, Prospective Evaluation of the Quality of Life Outcomes and Economic Impacts of Bariatric Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2008 to 2012Enrolled500ConditionsObesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cause of death in patients awaiting bariatric surgery.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raj S PadwalDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, 2F1,26 Walter C, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440-112th Street, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada. rpadwal@ualberta.ca
Sumit R Majumdar
Scott Klarenbach
Daniel W Birch
Shahzeer Karmali
Linda McCargar
Konrad Fassbender
Arya M Sharma
University of Alberta · CARoyal Alexandra Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 86642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtracted, multi-year wait times exist for bariatric care in Canada. Our objective was to examine wait-listed patients' health status and perceptions regarding the consequences of prolonged wait times using a cross-sectional study design nested within a prospective cohort.

methods150 consecutive consenting subjects wait-listed for multi-disciplinary bariatric assessment in a population-based medical/surgical bariatric program were surveyed. Health status was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). A Waiting List Impact Questionnaire (WLIQ) examined employment, physical stress, social support, frustration, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. Multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and BMI identified independent predictors of lower VAS scores.

results136 (91%) subjects were women, mean age was 43 years (SD 9), mean BMI was 49.4 (SD 8.3) kg/m2 and average time wait-listed was 64 days (SD 76). The mean VAS score was 53/100 (SD 22). According to the WLIQ, 47% of subjects agreed/strongly agreed that waiting affected their quality of life, 65% described wait times as 'concerning' and 81% as 'frustrating'. 86% reported worsening of physical symptoms over time. Nevertheless, only 31% were dissatisfied/very dissatisfied with their overall medical care. Independent predictors of lower VAS scores were higher BMI (beta coefficient 0.42; p = 0.03), unemployment (13.7; p = 0.01) and depression (10.3; p = 0.003).

conclusionsPatients wait-listed for bariatric care self-reported very impaired health status and other adverse consequences, attributing these to protracted waits. These data may help benchmark the level of health impairment in this population, understand the physical and mental toll of waiting, and assist with wait list management.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00850356.

Indexed as

Health StatusInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeAdultAlbertaBariatricsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22681857
PMCPMC3520121
OpenAlexW2132134967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.