Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22681850›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2012

Local perceptions of intermittent screening and treatment for malaria in school children on the south coast of Kenya.

George Okello, Sarah N Ndegwa, Katherine E Halliday, Kara Hanson, Simon J Brooker, Caroline Jones

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00878007 (Impact of Malaria Prevention on Health and Education in Kenyan Schoolchildren), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00878007 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Malaria Prevention on Health and Education in Kenyan Schoolchildren

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2010 to 2012Enrolled5,177ConditionsAnaemia, MalariaArmsIntermittent screening and treatment for malaria, Teacher training on literacy instruction, IST plus literacy instruction programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

George OkelloSocial and Behavioural Research Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. gokello@kilifi.kemri-wellcome.org
Sarah N Ndegwa
Katherine E Halliday
Kara Hanson
Simon J Brooker
Caroline Jones
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 081673Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 092765Wellcome Trust 098045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intermittent screening and treatment (IST) of school children for malaria is one possible intervention strategy that could help reduce the burden of malaria among school children. Future implementation of IST will not only depend on its efficacy and cost-effectiveness but also on its acceptability to parents of the children who receive IST, as well as those responsible for its delivery. This study was conducted alongside a cluster-randomized trial to investigate local perceptions of school-based IST among parents and other stakeholders on the Kenyan south coast.

methodsSix out of the 51 schools receiving the IST intervention were purposively sampled, based on the prevalence of Plasmodium infection, to participate in the qualitative study. Twenty-two focus group discussions and 17 in-depth interviews were conducted with parents and other key stakeholders involved in the implementation of school health programmes in the district. Data analysis was guided by the framework analysis method.

resultsHigh knowledge of the burden of clinical malaria on school children, the perceived benefits of preventing clinical disease through IST and previous positive experiences and interactions with other school health programmes facilitated the acceptability of IST. However, lack of understanding of the consequences of asymptomatic parasitaemia for apparently healthy school children could potentially contribute to non-adherence to treatment, and use of alternative anti-malarial drugs with simpler regimens was generally preferred. The general consensus of stakeholders was that health workers were best placed to undertake the screening and provide treatment, and although teachers' involvement in the programme is critical, most participants were opposed to teachers taking finger-prick blood samples from children. There was also a strong demand for the distribution of mosquito nets to augment IST.

conclusionSchool-based malaria control through IST was acceptable to most parents and other stakeholders, but careful consideration of the various roles of teachers, community health workers, and health workers, and the use of anti-malarial drugs with simpler regimens are critical to its future implementation.

Indexed as

ChildCommunity Health WorkersFacultyHumansInterviews as TopicKenyaMalariaMass ScreeningParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSchools

Identifiers

PMID22681850
PMCPMC3422207
OpenAlexW2137198261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.