Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22680691›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2012

Resistance of bacterial endospores to outer space for planetary protection purposes--experiment PROTECT of the EXPOSE-E mission.

Gerda Horneck, Ralf Moeller, Jean Cadet, Thierry Douki, Rocco L Mancinelli, Wayne L Nicholson, Corinna Panitz, Elke Rabbow, Petra Rettberg, Andrew Spry and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The extremotolerant desert mossInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The smallest space miners: principles of space biomining.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Draft Genome Sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gerda HorneckRadiation Biology Department, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany. gerda.horneck@dlr.de
Ralf Moeller
Jean Cadet
Thierry Douki
Rocco L Mancinelli
Wayne L Nicholson
Corinna Panitz
Elke Rabbow
Petra Rettberg
Andrew Spry
Erko Stackebrandt
Parag Vaishampayan
Kasthuri J Venkateswaran

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spore-forming bacteria are of particular concern in the context of planetary protection because their tough endospores may withstand certain sterilization procedures as well as the harsh environments of outer space or planetary surfaces. To test their hardiness on a hypothetical mission to Mars, spores of Bacillus subtilis 168 and Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032 were exposed for 1.5 years to selected parameters of space in the experiment PROTECT during the EXPOSE-E mission on board the International Space Station. Mounted as dry layers on spacecraft-qualified aluminum coupons, the "trip to Mars" spores experienced space vacuum, cosmic and extraterrestrial solar radiation, and temperature fluctuations, whereas the "stay on Mars" spores were subjected to a simulated martian environment that included atmospheric pressure and composition, and UV and cosmic radiation. The survival of spores from both assays was determined after retrieval. It was clearly shown that solar extraterrestrial UV radiation (λ≥110 nm) as well as the martian UV spectrum (λ≥200 nm) was the most deleterious factor applied; in some samples only a few survivors were recovered from spores exposed in monolayers. Spores in multilayers survived better by several orders of magnitude. All other environmental parameters encountered by the "trip to Mars" or "stay on Mars" spores did little harm to the spores, which showed about 50% survival or more. The data demonstrate the high chance of survival of spores on a Mars mission, if protected against solar irradiation. These results will have implications for planetary protection considerations.

Indexed as

Space FlightUltraviolet RaysBacillus subtilisExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsSpacecraftSpores, BacterialTemperature

Identifiers

PMID22680691
PMCPMC3371261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.