ArticleIMA fungus2011
A new dawn for the naming of fungi: impacts of decisions made in Melbourne in July 2011 on the future publication and regulation of fungal names.
Article in IMA fungus, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three new species ofMycoKeys · 2026Article
- Diversity of soil-borneFungal systematics and evolution · 2025Article
- Discordance Down Under: Combining Phylogenomics and Fungal Symbioses to Detangle Difficult Nodes in a Diverse Tribe of Australian Terrestrial Orchids.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Morpho-phylogenic characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Nomenclature for human and animal fungal pathogens and diseases: a proposal for standardized terminology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- Taxonomic revision ofMycology · 2024Article
- A fungal plant pathogen discovered in the Devonian Rhynie Chert.Nature communications · 2023Article
- FunFun: ITS-based functional annotator of fungal communities.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- MycoKeys issue 100: progress and innovation to enhance rapid publication in fungal systematics.MycoKeys · 2023Article
- The mitogenomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Species Diversity in the Fusarium solani (Neocosmospora) Complex and Their Pathogenicity for Plants and Humans.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2022Article
- Bioactive Compounds from Terrestrial and Marine-Derived Fungi of the GenusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Analyzing the human gut mycobiome - A short guide for beginners.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Disseminated Infection Due toKansas journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Biotic threats for 23 major non-native tree species in Europe.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Systematics, ecology, and application of Helotiales: Recent progress and future perspectives for research with special emphasis on activities within JapanMycoscience · 2021Review
- Phylogenetic and morphological analyses ofMycoKeys · 2021Article
- The Taxon Hypothesis Paradigm-On the Unambiguous Detection and Communication of Taxa.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Diagnostic Mycology: Xtreme Challenges.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Review
- NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A personal synopsis of the decisions made at the Nomenclature Section meeting of the International Botanical Congress in Melbourne in July 2011 is provided, with an emphasis on those which will affect the working practices of, or will otherwise be of interest to, mycologists. The topics covered include the re-naming of the Code, the acceptance of English as an alternative to Latin for validating diagnoses, conditions for permitting electronic publication of names, mandatory deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository for the valid publication of fungal names, the discontinuance of dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi, clarification of the typification of sanctioned names, and acceptability of names originally published under the zoological code. Collectively, these changes are the most fundamental to have been enacted at a single Congress since the 1950s, and herald the dawn of a new era in the practice of fungal nomenclature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.