Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22679587›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2011

Parascedosporium and its relatives: phylogeny and ecological trends.

Michaela Lackner, G Sybren de Hoog

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Physicochemical, microbial, and microbiome dynamics in winery waste composting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Diversity of Ophiostomatoid Fungi Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Cutaneous hyalohyphomycosis due toMedical mycology case reports · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New and Interesting Fungi. 2.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela LacknerFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany;
G Sybren de Hoog

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Scedosporium and its relatives comprising microascalean anamorphs with slimy conidia were studied. Graphium and Parascedosporium also belong to this complex, while teleomorphs are found in Pseudallescheria, Petriella, Petriellopsis, and Lophotrichus. Species complexes were clearly resolved by rDNA ITS sequencing. Significantly different ecological trends were observed between resolved species aggregates. The Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium prolificans clades were the only lineages with a marked opportunistic potential to mammals, while Petriella species were associated primarily with soil enriched by, e.g. dung. A consistent association with bark beetles was observed in the Graphium clade. The ex-type strain of Rhinocladium lesnei, CBS 108.10 was incorrectly implicated by Vuillemin (1910) in a case of human mycetoma; its sequence was identical to that of the ex-type strain of Parascedosporium tectonae, CBS 127.84.

Indexed as

Doratomyces putredinisGraphium putredinisMicroascales, ecologyParascedosporium tectonaePseudallescheriaRhinocladium lesneiScedosporium

Identifiers

PMID22679587
PMCPMC3317366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.