Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2013
Cetuximab-induced skin reactions are suppressed by cigarette smoking in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for skin rash among patients with cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Identifying key risk factors for thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing radical chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Retrospective Trial on Cetuximab Plus Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Association between cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer sidedness: A multi-center big-data platform-based analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody Cetuximab Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor-Receptor in Advanced Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is widely accepted as the most important risk factor for cancer in the modern world. Several constituents of cigarette smoke are known to interact with drug-metabolizing enzymes, potentially affecting the outcomes of drug treatment. Cetuximab (Erbitux(®); Merck Serono) is indicated for the treatment of colorectal cancer with respect to restoring chemosensitivity to irinotecan in irinotecan-resistant patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cigarette smoking adversely affects the actions of cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
methodsWe studied 56 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with cetuximab in our hospital during the time period from 2009 through 2010. We compared the adverse reaction rates of 16 patients who smoked (smokers) with those of 38 patients who did not smoke (non-smokers, including 16 patients who never smoked and 22 patients who were former smokers).
resultsThe incidence of skin reactions after cetuximab treatment was lower in the smokers than in the non-smokers. In addition, the incidence of anorexia was higher in the smokers than in the non-smokers. Within the group of non-smokers, no statistically significant differences were observed between the never smokers and the former smokers with regard to adverse reactions.
conclusionOur findings suggest that cigarette smoking during anticancer treatment with cetuximab-based regimens reduces the skin reaction, which leads to a reduction in the benefit of the treatment; therefore, patients should quit smoking, at least while receiving cetuximab-based treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.