ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012
Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2017Pooled it
- Peri-incisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine administration: a new effective tool in pain control after laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- Learning curve of single-port gasless laparoscopy for gynecological procedures: a cumulative sum analysis of 42 consecutive cases.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Postoperative pain after MiniLap percutaneous versus standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: A propensity-matched study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Mini-laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the management of endometrial cancer.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025Article
- Scar-Free Laparoscopy in BRCA-Mutated Women.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.Updates in surgery · 2022Review
- The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Percutaneous-assisted vs mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of ultra-minimally invasive approaches.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic vs percutaneous hysterectomy in obese patients: a prospective evaluation.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2020Article
- Mini-Laparoscopic Repair of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) by Lateral Suspension with Mesh.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2018Article
- The Senhance™ surgical robotic system ("Senhance") for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2018Article
- Mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix using interchangeable 5-mm end effectors: a way to cross the line of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecologic oncology.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2017Article
- Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2017Article
- Reduced port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a needle scope for lung and mediastinal lesions.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2013Article
- Total microlaparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Retroperitoneal Approach in Single-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Single-access laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: A single-institution experience and review of literature.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
- Assessment of Tubal Patency with Selective Chromopertubation at Office Hysteroscopy versus Modified Minilaparoscopy in Infertile Women.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to compare perioperative outcomes and postoperative pain of standard laparoscopic (S-LPS), minilaparoscopic (M-LPS), and laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysterectomy.
methodsA single-institutional, matched, retrospective, cohort study was performed. Between May 2010 and March 2011, 85 consecutive women were submitted to a total laparoscopic hysterectomy by S-LPS, M-LPS, and single-port LESS. Perioperative outcomes of these three techniques were analyzed and compared.
resultsDemographics and baseline characteristics of each group were absolutely comparable. The median operative time was longer [105 (range, 75-125) min] in the LESS group compared with the M-LPS group [90 (range, 60-120) min; p < 0.011] and S-LPS [80 (range, 50-110) min; p < 0.001]. No statistically significant differences have been reported for estimated blood loss or intra- and early postoperative complications. Postoperative pain control was better for LESS and M-LPS than S-LPS.
conclusionsM-LPS and LESS hysterectomy can be performed safely, and both seem to be associated with a halving of early postoperative pain with a lower request of analgesics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.