ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2013
Mammaglobin-A cDNA vaccination of breast cancer patients induces antigen-specific cytotoxic CD4+ICOShi T cells.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment plus Mammaglobin-A DNA Vaccine Induces Antitumor Immune Responses in the Primary Tumor and Peripheral Blood of Patients with Breast Cancer: Insights from a Phase Ib Clinical Trial.Cancer immunology research · 2026Article
- Cytotoxic CD4Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Regulatory T cells in breast cancer drivers of immune suppression and targets for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Bioinformatics analysis of innovative multi-epitope vaccine utilizing MAGE-A, MAM-A, and Gal-3 for breast cancer management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The screening, identification, design and clinical application of tumor-specific neoantigens for TCR-T cells.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- The Enigma of Mammaglobin: Redefining the Biomarker Paradigm in Breast Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advancements in clinical aspects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in breast cancer.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Immunological Landscape of HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Review
- Neoantigen vaccine platforms in clinical development: understanding the future of personalized immunotherapy.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Review
- Soluble Spike DNA Vaccine Provides Long-Term Protective Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice and Nonhuman Primates.Vaccines · 2021Article
- Cancer Vaccines, Treatment of the Future: With Emphasis on HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Efficacy of co-immunization with the DNA and peptide vaccines containing SYCP1 and ACRBP epitopes in a murine triple-negative breast cancer model.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- A Guide to Nucleic Acid Vaccines in the Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases and Cancers: From Basic Principles to Current Applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Review
- Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer.Drug discovery today · 2020Review
- Methylselenol producing selenocompounds enhance the efficiency of mammaglobin-A peptide vaccination against breast cancer cells.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Article
- Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mammaglobin-A (Mam-A) is a 10 kDa secretory protein that is overexpressed in 80 % of primary and metastatic human breast cancers. Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that Mam-A cDNA vaccine can induce Mam-A-specific CD8 T cell responses and mediate regression of human breast cancer xenografts in NOD/SCID mice. In this article, we present our results on a phase I clinical trial of a Mam-A cDNA vaccination in breast cancer patients with stage-IV metastatic disease, including the impact of vaccination on the expression of the inducible co-stimulator molecule (ICOS) on CD4 T cells. Specimens from seven patients with stage-IV metastatic cancer were available for these analyses. Patients were vaccinated with a Mam-A cDNA vaccine on days 0, 28, and 56, and immune responses were assessed at serial time points following vaccination. At 6 months following the first vaccination, flow cytometric analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the frequency of CD4+ICOS(hi) T cells from 5 ± 2 % pre-vaccination to 23 ± 4 % (p < 0.001), with a concomitant decrease in the frequency of CD4+FoxP3+ T cells (regulatory T cells [Treg]) from 19 ± 6 to 10 ± 5 % (p < 0.05). ELISpot analysis of CD4+ICOS(hi) sorted T cells demonstrated that following vaccination the cytokines produced by Mam-A-specific T cells switched from IL-10 (78 ± 21 spm pre-vaccination to 32 ± 14 spm 5 months post-vaccine p < 0.001) to IFN-γ (12 ± 6 spm pre-vaccination to 124 ± 31 spm 5 months post-vaccine p < 0.001). The ratio of CD4+ICOS(hi) T cells to CD4+FoxP3+ T cells increased from 0.37 ± 0.12 before vaccination to 2.3 ± 0.72 (p = 0.021) following vaccination. Further, these activated CD4+ICOS(hi) T cells induced preferential lysis of human breast cancer cells expressing Mam-A protein. We conclude that Mam-A cDNA vaccination is associated with specific expansion and activation of CD4+ICOS(hi) T cells, with a concomitant decrease in Treg frequency. These encouraging results strongly suggest that Mam-A cDNA vaccination can induce antitumor immunity in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.