ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Observing the confinement potential of bacterial pore-forming toxin receptors inside rafts with nonblinking Eu(3+)-doped oxide nanoparticles.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Confinement energy landscape classification reveals membrane receptor nano-organization mechanisms.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- The MAL Protein, an Integral Component of Specialized Membranes, in Normal Cells and Cancer.Cells · 2021Review
- Errors in Energy Landscapes Measured with Particle Tracking.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- A Primer on the Bayesian Approach to High-Density Single-Molecule Trajectories Analysis.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
- The Myelin and Lymphocyte Protein MAL Is Required for Binding and Activity of Clostridium perfringens ε-Toxin.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
- Article
- Receptor displacement in the cell membrane by hydrodynamic force amplification through nanoparticles.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Probing membrane protein interactions with their lipid raft environment using single-molecule tracking and Bayesian inference analysis.PloS one · 2013Article
- Bayesian decision tree for the classification of the mode of motion in single-molecule trajectories.PloS one · 2013Article
- A magnetic switch for the control of cell death signalling in in vitro and in vivo systems.Nature materials · 2012Article
- A Bayesian inference scheme to extract diffusivity and potential fields from confined single-molecule trajectories.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Oligomerization of Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin is dependent upon caveolins 1 and 2.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We track single toxin receptors on the apical cell membrane of MDCK cells with Eu-doped oxide nanoparticles coupled to two toxins of the pore-forming toxin family: α-toxin of Clostridium septicum and ε-toxin of Clostridium perfringens. These nonblinking and photostable labels do not perturb the motion of the toxin receptors and yield long uninterrupted trajectories with mean localization precision of 30 nm for acquisition times of 51.3 ms. We were thus able to study the toxin-cell interaction at the single-molecule level. Toxins bind to receptors that are confined within zones of mean area 0.40 ± 0.05 μm(2). Assuming that the receptors move according to the Langevin equation of motion and using Bayesian inference, we determined mean diffusion coefficients of 0.16 ± 0.01 μm(2)/s for both toxin receptors. Moreover, application of this approach revealed a force field within the domain generated by a springlike confining potential. Both toxin receptors were found to experience forces characterized by a mean spring constant of 0.30 ± 0.03 pN/μm at 37°C. Furthermore, both toxin receptors showed similar distributions of diffusion coefficient, domain area, and spring constant. Control experiments before and after incubation with cholesterol oxidase and sphingomyelinase show that these two enzymes disrupt the confinement domains and lead to quasi-free motion of the toxin receptors. Our control data showing cholesterol and sphingomyelin dependence as well as independence of actin depolymerization and microtubule disruption lead us to attribute the confinement of both receptors to lipid rafts. These toxins require oligomerization to develop their toxic activity. The confined nature of the toxin receptors leads to a local enhancement of the toxin monomer concentration and may thus explain the virulence of this toxin family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.