Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22675477›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study.

Madeleine J Murtagh, Duika L Burges Watson, K Neil Jenkings, Mabel L S Lie, Joan E Mackintosh, Gary A Ford, Richard G Thomson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Palliative care after stroke: A review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madeleine J MurtaghInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. mm399@le.ac.uk
Duika L Burges Watson
K Neil Jenkings
Mabel L S Lie
Joan E Mackintosh
Gary A Ford
Richard G Thomson
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Early treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with rtPA reduces the risk of longer term dependency but carries an increased risk of causing immediate bleeding complications. To understand the challenges of knowledge translation and decision making about treatment with rtPA in hyperacute stroke and hence to inform development of appropriate decision support we interviewed patients, their family and health professionals. The emergency setting and the symptomatic effects of hyper-acute stroke shaped the form, content and manner of knowledge translation to support decision making. Decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke presented three conundrums for patients, family and clinicians. 1) How to allow time for reflection in a severely time-limited setting. 2) How to facilitate knowledge translation regarding important treatment risks and benefits when patient and family capacity is blunted by the effects and shock of stroke. 3) How to ensure patient and family views are taken into account when the situation produces reliance on the expertise of clinicians. Strategies adopted to meet these conundrums were fourfold: face to face communication; shaping decisions; incremental provision of information; and communication tailored to the individual patient. Relational forms of interaction were understood to engender trust and allay anxiety. Shaping decisions with patients was understood as an expression of confidence by clinicians that helped alleviate anxiety and offered hope and reassurance to patients and their family experiencing the shock of the stroke event. Neutral presentations of information and treatment options promoted uncertainty and contributed to anxiety. 'Drip feeding' information created moments for reflection: clinicians literally made time. Tailoring information to the particular patient and family situation allowed clinicians to account for social and emotional contexts. The principal responses to the challenges of decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke were relational decision support and situationally-sensitive knowledge translation.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchEmergency Medical ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicRecombinant ProteinsStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue Plasminogen ActivatorRecombinant ProteinsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID22675477
PMCPMC3365903
OpenAlexW2100920083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.