ArticlePloS one2012
Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Practice variation in the informed consent procedure for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a survey among neurologists and neurology residents.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Palliative care after stroke: A review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021Review
- Treatment decision-making in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a patient's perspective.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Financial Burden of Stroke Reflected in a Pilot Center for the Implementation of Thrombolysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Legal medicine implications in fibrinolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2017Review
- Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Article
- Development of a decision analytic model to support decision making and risk communication about thrombolytic treatment.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Development of a computerised decision aid for thrombolysis in acute stroke care.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Article
- Telephone consultations for tissue plasminogen activator administration in acute stroke.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2014Article
- A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: lessons for tool developers.BMC health services research · 2013Review
- Patient Pathways During Acute in-Hospital Stroke Treatment: A Qualitative Multi-Method Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Early treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with rtPA reduces the risk of longer term dependency but carries an increased risk of causing immediate bleeding complications. To understand the challenges of knowledge translation and decision making about treatment with rtPA in hyperacute stroke and hence to inform development of appropriate decision support we interviewed patients, their family and health professionals. The emergency setting and the symptomatic effects of hyper-acute stroke shaped the form, content and manner of knowledge translation to support decision making. Decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke presented three conundrums for patients, family and clinicians. 1) How to allow time for reflection in a severely time-limited setting. 2) How to facilitate knowledge translation regarding important treatment risks and benefits when patient and family capacity is blunted by the effects and shock of stroke. 3) How to ensure patient and family views are taken into account when the situation produces reliance on the expertise of clinicians. Strategies adopted to meet these conundrums were fourfold: face to face communication; shaping decisions; incremental provision of information; and communication tailored to the individual patient. Relational forms of interaction were understood to engender trust and allay anxiety. Shaping decisions with patients was understood as an expression of confidence by clinicians that helped alleviate anxiety and offered hope and reassurance to patients and their family experiencing the shock of the stroke event. Neutral presentations of information and treatment options promoted uncertainty and contributed to anxiety. 'Drip feeding' information created moments for reflection: clinicians literally made time. Tailoring information to the particular patient and family situation allowed clinicians to account for social and emotional contexts. The principal responses to the challenges of decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke were relational decision support and situationally-sensitive knowledge translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.