ArticlePloS one2012
Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,336 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1,336 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Embracing the power of genomics to inform evolutionary significant units.The Journal of heredity · 2026Pooled it
- Extreme longevity revealed by 24-year genetic mark-recapture challenges conservation of endangered sea cucumbers.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Underground allies: Mycorrhizal flexibility facilitates orchid occurrence in post-mining landscapes.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Species distribution models predict genome-wide polymorphism and gene flow in an endangered amphibian.Heredity · 2026Article
- Article
- Phylotranscriptomics Allows Distinguishing Major Gene Flow Events from Incomplete Lineage Sorting in Rapidly Diversifying Mimetic Orchids (Genus Ophrys).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Panmixia in a Widespread Butterfly: High Dispersal and Ecological Generalism Buffer Against Landscape Fragmentation.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic Structure and Signs of Local Adaptation in Icelandic Brown Trout Populations.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genotype-Phenotype-Environment Associations and Potential Local Adaptation Signals in the Mesquite Lizard Along the Eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Allelic Survey and Population Genomics in a Hotspot of Diflubenzuron Resistance in the MosquitoInsects · 2026Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Delimitation of Species in a Temperate Aquatic Biodiversity Hotspot.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- How Did a Size-Divergent Water Strider Species Group Exhibiting an East Asia-Eastern North America Disjunction Originate and Diversify?Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Global Population Structure and Dynamics of Wheat Powdery Mildew.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Local Adaptation to Current but Not Future Climate in Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests: Population Genomic Evidence in a Neotropical Legume Tree.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Two Closely Related Butterflies Show Pseudo-Concordant Patterns of Geographic Differentiation in a Heterogeneous Mountain Region.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Quaternary Climate Oscillations Shape Genetic Diversity and Spatial Structure ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic Predictors of Diapause Polymorphism in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus With Implications for Voltinism Potential and Outbreak Dynamics.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
1,276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to efficiently and accurately determine genotypes is a keystone technology in modern genetics, crucial to studies ranging from clinical diagnostics, to genotype-phenotype association, to reconstruction of ancestry and the detection of selection. To date, high capacity, low cost genotyping has been largely achieved via "SNP chip" microarray-based platforms which require substantial prior knowledge of both genome sequence and variability, and once designed are suitable only for those targeted variable nucleotide sites. This method introduces substantial ascertainment bias and inherently precludes detection of rare or population-specific variants, a major source of information for both population history and genotype-phenotype association. Recent developments in reduced-representation genome sequencing experiments on massively parallel sequencers (commonly referred to as RAD-tag or RADseq) have brought direct sequencing to the problem of population genotyping, but increased cost and procedural and analytical complexity have limited their widespread adoption. Here, we describe a complete laboratory protocol, including a custom combinatorial indexing method, and accompanying software tools to facilitate genotyping across large numbers (hundreds or more) of individuals for a range of markers (hundreds to hundreds of thousands). Our method requires no prior genomic knowledge and achieves per-site and per-individual costs below that of current SNP chip technology, while requiring similar hands-on time investment, comparable amounts of input DNA, and downstream analysis times on the order of hours. Finally, we provide empirical results from the application of this method to both genotyping in a laboratory cross and in wild populations. Because of its flexibility, this modified RADseq approach promises to be applicable to a diversity of biological questions in a wide range of organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.