Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22675405›Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2012

Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 Guideline.

Karl Werdan, Martin Ruß, Michael Buerke, Georg Delle-Karth, Alexander Geppert, Friedrich A Schöndube, German Cardiac Society, German Society of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, (Austrian Society of Internal and General Intensive Care Medicine and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03635840 (The Effects of Intra Aortic Balloon Pump Prior to Revascularization on Mortality of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03635840 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Intra Aortic Balloon Pump Prior to Revascularization on Mortality of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled34ConditionsCardiogenic ShockArmsIntra Aortic Balloon Pump
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of levosimendan on the outcome of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Outcome of elderly undergoing extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Angiopoietin-2 and outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Trial
  9. Noninvasive Ventilation in Cardiogenic Shock: Reconsidering Contraindications.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Efficacy of Non-invasive Ventilation Compared with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Ventilation strategies in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK observational registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Karl WerdanDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Halle (Saale), Germany. karl.werdan@uk-halle.de
Martin Ruß
Michael Buerke
Georg Delle-Karth
Alexander Geppert
Friedrich A Schöndube
German Cardiac Society
German Society of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
(Austrian Society of Internal and General Intensive Care Medicine
German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
Austrian Society of Cardiology
German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
German Society of Preventive Medicine and Rehabilitation
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEDr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals · INUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfarction-related cardiogenic shock (ICS) is usually due to left-ventricular pump failure. With a mortality of 30% to 80%, ICS is the most common cause of death from acute myocardial infarction. The S3 guideline presented here characterizes the current evidence-based treatment of ICS: early revascularization, treatment of shock, and intensive care treatment of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) if it arises. The success or failure of treatment for MODS determines the outcome in ICS.

methodsExperts from eight German and Austrian specialty societies analyzed approximately 3600 publications that had been retrieved by a systematic literature search. Three interdisciplinary consensus conferences were held, resulting in the issuing of 111 recommendations and algorithms for this S3 guideline.

resultsEarly revascularization of the occluded vessel, usually with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is of paramount importance. The medical treatment of shock consists of dobutamine as the inotropic agent and norepinephrine as the vasopressor of choice and is guided by a combination of pressure and flow values, or by the cardiac power index. Levosimendan can be given in addition to treat catecholamine-resistant shock. For patients with ICS who are treated with PCI, the current S3 guideline differs from the European and American myocardial infarction guidelines with respect to the recommendation for intra-aortic balloon pulsation (IABP): Whereas the former guidelines give a class I recommendation for IABP, this S3 guideline states only that IABP "can" be used in this situation, in view of the poor state of the evidence. Only for patients being treated with systemic fibrinolysis is IABP weakly recommended (IABP "should" be used in such cases). With regard to the optimal intensive-care interventions for the prevention and treatment of MODS, recommendations are given concerning ventilation, nutrition, erythrocyte-concentrate transfusion, prevention of thrombosis and stress ulcers, follow-up care, and rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: The goal of this S3 guideline is to bring together the types of treatment for ICS that lie in the disciplines of cardiology and intensive-care medicine, as patients with ICS die not only of pump failure, but also (and even more frequently) of MODS. This is the first guideline that adequately emphasizes the significance of MODS as a determinant of the outcome of ICS.

Indexed as

AustriaCardiologyGermanyHumansMyocardial InfarctionShock, Cardiogenic

Identifiers

PMID22675405
PMCPMC3364528
OpenAlexW336592978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.