Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22675204›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2012

Polar opposites: Erk direction of CD4 T cell subsets.

Chiung-Fang Chang, Warren N D'Souza, Irene L Ch'en, Gilles Pages, Jacques Pouyssegur, Stephen M Hedrick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. T lymphocyte-specific deletion of SHP1 and SHP2 promotes activation-induced cell death of CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Sulfide is a keystone metabolite for gut homeostasis and immunity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of the Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Genetic VariantNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Absent in Melanoma 2 (AIM2) Regulates the Stability of Regulatory T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rat and fish peripheral blood leukocytes respond distinctively toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Genome-Wide miRNA Expression Profiling of Molecular Subgroups of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation under the Control of ERK2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiung-Fang ChangUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0377, USA.
Warren N D'Souza
Irene L Ch'en
Gilles Pages
Jacques Pouyssegur
Stephen M Hedrick
University of California, San Diego · USCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRAmgen (United States) · US

Funding

The Regulation of T Cell DevelopmentR01AI021372 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HEDRICK, STEPHEN M · 1985 to 2011
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 5R01AI021372-27NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI021372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective immune responses depend upon appropriate T cell differentiation in accord with the nature of an infectious agent, and the contingency of differentiation depends minimally on TCR, coreceptor, and cytokine signals. In this reverse genetic study, we show that the MAPK Erk2 is not essential for T cell proliferation in the presence of optimum costimulation. Instead, it has opposite effects on T-bet and Gata3 expression and, hence, on Th1 and Th2 differentiation. Alternatively, in the presence of TGF-β, the Erk pathway suppresses a large program of gene expression, effectively limiting the differentiation of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. In the latter case, the mechanisms involved include suppression of Gata3 and Foxp3, induction of Tbx21, phosphorylation of Smad2,3, and possibly suppression of Socs2, a positive inducer of Stat5 signaling. Consequently, loss of Erk2 severely impeded Th1 differentiation while enhancing the development of Foxp3(+)-induced T regulatory cells. Selected profiles of gene expression under multiple conditions of T cell activation illustrate the opposing consequences of Erk pathway signaling.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationCell PolarityCell ProliferationCells, CulturedForkhead Transcription FactorsLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Th1 CellsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryT-Lymphocyte SubsetsUp-RegulationForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp3 protein, mouseMAPK1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1

Identifiers

PMID22675204
PMCPMC3392534
OpenAlexW2139047992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.