Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22674270›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Retronasal odor representations in the dorsal olfactory bulb of rats.

Shree Hari Gautam, Justus V Verhagen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Odor encoding by signals in the olfactory bulb.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shree Hari GautamThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut 06519, USA.
Justus V Verhagen
John B. Pierce Laboratory · US

Funding

Bulbar maps to retronasal smell by optical calcium imaging and fMRI in acute ratR01DC011286 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Multimodal flavor integration and retronasal olfaction in the ratR01DC009994 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009994NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009994NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011286NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals perceive their olfactory environment not only from odors originating in the external world (orthonasal route) but also from odors released in the oral cavity while eating food (retronasal route). Retronasal olfaction is crucial for the perception of food flavor in humans. However, little is known about the retronasal stimulus coding in the brain. The most basic questions are if and how route affects the odor representations at the level of the olfactory bulb (OB), where odor quality codes originate. We used optical calcium imaging of presynaptic dorsal OB responses to odorants in anesthetized rats to ask whether the rat OB could be activated retronasally, and how these responses compare to orthonasal responses under similar conditions. We further investigated the effects of specific odorant properties on orthonasal versus retronasal response patterns. We found that at a physiologically relevant flow rate, retronasal odorants can effectively reach the olfactory receptor neurons, eliciting glomerular response patterns that grossly overlap with those of orthonasal responses, but differ from the orthonasal patterns in the response amplitude and temporal dynamics. Interestingly, such differences correlated well with specific odorant properties. Less volatile odorants yielded relatively smaller responses retronasally, but volatility did not affect relative temporal profiles. More polar odorants responded with relatively longer onset latency and time to peak retronasally, but polarity did not affect relative response magnitudes. These data provide insight into the early stages of retronasal stimulus coding and establish relationships between orthonasal and retronasal odor representations in the rat OB.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleMouthNasal CavityNeuroimagingOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsRatsRats, Long-EvansRespirationSmell

Identifiers

PMID22674270
PMCPMC3516401
OpenAlexW2092100292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.