Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22674198›Full record

Trial reportCancer2012

Two phase 2 trials of the novel Akt inhibitor perifosine in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.

Daniel C Cho, Thomas E Hutson, Wolfram Samlowski, Peter Sportelli, Brad Somer, Paul Richards, Jeffrey A Sosman, Igor Puzanov, M Dror Michaelson, Keith T Flaherty and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A randomized phase 2 study of MK-2206 versus everolimus in refractory renal cell carcinoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. New Insights Into Targeting Membrane Lipids for Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel C ChoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. dcho1@bidmc.harvard.edu
Thomas E Hutson
Wolfram Samlowski
Peter Sportelli
Brad Somer
Paul Richards
Jeffrey A Sosman
Igor Puzanov
M Dror Michaelson
Keith T Flaherty
Robert A Figlin
Nicholas J Vogelzang
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada · USPenn Center for AIDS Research · USVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterAthenex (United States) · US

Funding

Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wanling Xie · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
Targeting the PI3-Kinase/Akt Pathway for the Therapy of Renal Cell CarcinomaK08CA142890 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHO, DANIEL CHANG · 2009 to 2013
$847k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA142890NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942NCI NIH HHS P50CA101942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical activity of allosteric inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may be limited by upstream activation of phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3)-kinase/Akt resulting from mTOR1 inhibition. On the basis of this rationale, 2 independent phase 2 trials (Perifosine 228 and 231) were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel Akt inhibitor perifosine in patients with advanced RCC who had failed on previous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy.

methodsIn the Perifosine 228 trial, 24 patients with advanced RCC received oral perifosine (100 mg daily). Perifosine 231 enrolled 2 groups that received daily oral perifosine (100 mg daily): Group A comprised 32 patients who had received no prior mTOR inhibitor, and Group B comprised 18 patients who had received 1 prior mTOR inhibitor.

resultsIn the Perifosine 228 trial, 1 patient achieved a partial response (objective response rate, 4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7%-20%), and 11 patients (46%) had stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 14.2 weeks (95% confidence interval, 7.7-21.6 weeks). In the Perifosine 231 trial, 5 patients achieved a partial response (objective response rate, 10%; 95% confidence interval, 4.5%-22.2%) and 16 patients (32%) had stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 14 weeks (95% confidence interval, 12.9, 20.7 weeks). Overall, perifosine was well tolerated, and there were very few grade 3 and 4 events. The most common toxicities included nausea, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, and fatigue.

conclusionsAlthough perifosine demonstrated activity in patients with advanced RCC after failure on VEGF-targeted therapy, its activity was not superior to currently available second-line agents. Nonetheless, perifosine may be worthy of further study in RCC in combination with other currently available therapies.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPhosphorylcholinePrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktperifosinePhosphorylcholineProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22674198
PMCPMC3934426
OpenAlexW1571056179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.