Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22674192›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2012

Thoracolumbar fracture reduction by percutaneous in situ contouring.

Yann Philippe Charles, Axel Walter, Sébastien Schuller, Dakheel Aldakheel, Jean-Paul Steib

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Osteoarthritis and spontaneous fusion of facet joints after percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  6. Minimally invasive spinal surgery for trauma: a narrative review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yann Philippe CharlesService de Chirurgie du Rachis, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, B.P. 426, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France. yann.philippe.charles@chru-strasbourg.fr
Axel Walter
Sébastien Schuller
Dakheel Aldakheel
Jean-Paul Steib

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePercutaneous in situ contouring is based on bilateral bending of rods on the spine, thus increasing lordosis at the fracture. It was analyzed if this technique would provide a better reduction than prone positioning and how sagittal alignment would behave.

methodsTwenty-nine patients were operated using in situ contouring and selective anterior fusion for non-neurologic A2, A3 or B2 fractures. Clinical results were assessed prospectively using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The radiographic deformity correction was measured by sagittal index and regional kyphosis. Sagittal balance was assessed using kyphosis, lordosis, T9 tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope. Posterior wall fragment reduction was evaluated by computed tomography.

resultsAfter 2 years, VAS and ODI were comparable to the status prior to the accident. The sagittal index was 19.7° preoperatively, 5.3° after prone positioning and -1.1° after in situ contouring (p < 0.001). The loss of correction was 2.4°, mainly during the first 3 months. Similar observations were made for regional kyphosis. The sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was stable postoperatively. A preoperative canal obstruction ≥50 % was observed in 16 patients, and the fragments migrated anteriorly in all patients.

conclusionsPercutaneous instrumentation and anterior fusion provides good clinical results. In situ contouring increases lordosis obtained by prone positioning. Anterior column lengthening and ligamentotaxis reduce posterior wall fragments, which decompress the canal without laminectomy. The fusion of anterior defects prevents the loss of correction and provides a stable sagittal profile. The instrumentation may be removed without damaging the paravertebral muscles and loss of correction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSpinal FracturesSpinal FusionThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22674192
PMCPMC3481095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.