Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22674050›Full record

Trial reportCancer2012

Treatment outcome in older patients with childhood acute myeloid leukemia.

Jeffrey E Rubnitz, Stanley Pounds, Xueyuan Cao, Laura Jenkins, Gary Dahl, W Paul Bowman, Jeffrey W Taub, Ching-Hon Pui, Raul C Ribeiro, Dario Campana and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acute kidney injury and childhood acute myeloid leukemia.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric patients with leukemia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey E RubnitzDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA. jeffrey.rubnitz@stjude.org
Stanley Pounds
Xueyuan Cao
Laura Jenkins
Gary Dahl
W Paul Bowman
Jeffrey W Taub
Ching-Hon Pui
Raul C Ribeiro
Dario Campana
Hiroto Inaba
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USChildren's Hospital of Michigan · USCook Children's Medical Center · USLucile Packard Children's Hospital · USNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
PROFESSIONAL ONCOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA023944 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SUZANNE A. GRONEMEYER · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765-30NCI NIH HHS R25 CA023944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder age has historically been an adverse prognostic factor in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To the authors' knowledge, the impact of age relative to that of other prognostic factors on the outcome of patients treated in recent trials is unknown.

methodsClinical outcome and causes of treatment failure of 351 patients enrolled on 3 consecutive protocols for childhood AML between 1991 and 2008 were analyzed according to age and protocol.

resultsThe more recent protocol (AML02) produced improved outcomes for patients aged 10 years to 21 years compared with 2 earlier studies (AML91 and AML97), with 3-year rates of event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of refractory leukemia or recurrence (CIR) for this group being similar to those of patients aged birth to 9 years: EFS: 58.3% ± 5.4% versus 66.6% ± 4.9% (P = .20); OS: 68.9% ± 5.1% versus 75.1% ± 4.5% (P = .36); and CIR: 21.9% ± 4.4% versus 25.3% ± 4.2% (P = .59). The EFS and OS estimates for patients aged 10 to 15 years overlapped those for patients aged 16 to 21 years. However, the cumulative incidence of toxic death was significantly higher for patients aged 10 to 21 years compared with younger patients (13.2% ± 3.6% vs 4.5% ± 2.0%; P = .028).

conclusionsThe survival rate for older children with AML has improved on the results of a recent trial and is now similar to that of younger patients. However, deaths from toxicity remain a significant problem for patients in the older age group. Future trials should focus on improving supportive care while striving to develop more effective antileukemic therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolCladribineCombined Modality TherapyCytarabineEtoposideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleCladribineCytarabineEtoposide

Identifiers

PMID22674050
PMCPMC3557958
OpenAlexW1560861175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.