Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22673804›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Charles H Langley, Kristian Stevens, Charis Cardeno, Yuh Chwen G Lee, Daniel R Schrider, John E Pool, Sasha A Langley, Charlyn Suarez, Russell B Corbett-Detig, Bryan Kolaczkowski and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed
26.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 385 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polarising SNPs Without Outgroup.Molecular ecology resources · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pervasive suppressors halt the spread of selfishbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On ARGs, pedigrees, and genetic relatedness matrices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles H LangleyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. chlangley@ucdavis.edu
Kristian Stevens
Charis Cardeno
Yuh Chwen G Lee
Daniel R Schrider
John E Pool
Sasha A Langley
Charlyn Suarez
Russell B Corbett-Detig
Bryan Kolaczkowski
Shu Fang
Phillip M Nista
Alisha K Holloway
Andrew D Kern
Colin N Dewey
Yun S Song
Matthew W Hahn
David J Begun
University of California, Davis · USIndiana University Bloomington · USBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWGladstone Institutes · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
Mathematical Models and Statistical Methods for Large-Scale Population GenomicsR01GM094402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SONG, YUN S · 2010 to 2018
$2.2M
Novel Methods for Characterizing Recombination and SelectionR00GM080099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SONG, YUN S · 2008 to 2010
$744k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02942NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002942NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM080099NIGMS NIH HHS R00-GM080099NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094402NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM094402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report of independent genome sequences of two natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster (37 from North America and 6 from Africa) provides unique insight into forces shaping genomic polymorphism and divergence. Evidence of interactions between natural selection and genetic linkage is abundant not only in centromere- and telomere-proximal regions, but also throughout the euchromatic arms. Linkage disequilibrium, which decays within 1 kbp, exhibits a strong bias toward coupling of the more frequent alleles and provides a high-resolution map of recombination rate. The juxtaposition of population genetics statistics in small genomic windows with gene structures and chromatin states yields a rich, high-resolution annotation, including the following: (1) 5'- and 3'-UTRs are enriched for regions of reduced polymorphism relative to lineage-specific divergence; (2) exons overlap with windows of excess relative polymorphism; (3) epigenetic marks associated with active transcription initiation sites overlap with regions of reduced relative polymorphism and relatively reduced estimates of the rate of recombination; (4) the rate of adaptive nonsynonymous fixation increases with the rate of crossing over per base pair; and (5) both duplications and deletions are enriched near origins of replication and their density correlates negatively with the rate of crossing over. Available demographic models of X and autosome descent cannot account for the increased divergence on the X and loss of diversity associated with the out-of-Africa migration. Comparison of the variation among these genomes to variation among genomes from D. simulans suggests that many targets of directional selection are shared between these species.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageGenetic VariationGenomeAfricaAnimalsCentromereChromatinChromosome MappingDrosophila melanogasterGenetics, PopulationLinkage DisequilibriumSelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityTelomereUntranslated RegionsX ChromosomeChromatinUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID22673804
PMCPMC3454882
OpenAlexW2138007075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.