ArticleAddictive behaviors2012
Treatment seeking and subsequent 1-year drinking outcomes among treatment clients in Sweden and the U.S.A.: a cross-cultural comparison.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of organisational factors on treatment outcomes for those seeking alcohol or other drug treatment: A systematic review.Drug and alcohol review · 2023Pooled it
- Measuring social integration, treatment, and mortality after substance use treatment: methodological elaborations in a 20-year follow-up study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2018Article
- Alcohol abstinence, non-hazardous use and hazardous use a decade after alcohol-related hospitalization: registry data linked to population-based representative postal surveys.BMC public health · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-cultural comparisons provide a method for distinguishing unique aspects as well as shared aspects of different cultures. Theoretically framed by a health-services conceptual model, we examine the extent that culture-specific versus common characteristics are associated with treatment seeking and drinking outcome. Swedish (n=997) and U.S. (n=501) alcohol-dependent individuals were interviewed at baseline and 1-year (n=635 and n=384 respectively). Both studies gathered comparable background, help-seeking, and drinking data. Regression models tested predictors of 1-year follow-up drinking defined as abstinence or moderate drinking versus heavy drinking. Swedish individuals were older and had social networks comprised mostly of substance abusers compared to U.S. individuals who reported higher problem severity and greater drug involvement. Whereas U.S. individuals reported greater prior mutual-help attendance, Swedish individuals reported greater prior treatment involvement. Better 1-year drinking outcomes were reported by women, younger age groups and those with an abstinence goal in both samples. Cultural and institutional differences were apparent. For example, with Swedish individuals having a mostly non-using network predicted better outcomes, whereas lower problem severity was a predictor for U.S. individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.