ReviewMolecular plant pathology2012
Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology.
Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 884 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
884 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 mediates precise and efficient gene editing inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Pathogen local adaptation shapes Pierce's disease of grapevines outcomes under field conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- The RpfF Acyl-ACP thioesterase of major rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae is essential for maintenance of membrane function and virulence.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Validation and optimization of a multi-processor UV-C reactor for inactivation of potato brown rot and soft rot pathogens in surface irrigation water in the Nile Delta.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics and overexpression analyses reveal StERF87 confers resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in potato.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- Design of a Bacteriophage-Based Product for Biocontrol of Fire Blight and Black Rot.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genetic insights into bacterial wilt resistance using genomic prediction and association mapping in blueberry.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Land-Use and Depth-Dependent Assembly of Soil Microbiomes Shapes Ecological Functions, Interaction Networks, and Phytopathogenic Communities Across Crop and Orchard Systems.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synthetic communities and metabolite-driven enrichment of keystone rhizosphere microbial taxa suppress bacterial wilt disease in peanut.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Beneath the Bark: Molecular Determinants of Adaptation and Infection in Bacterial Pathogens of Woody Hosts.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Review
- Cinnamic acid derivatives in agrochemicals: current use and future perspective.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Beyond the Halo: Molecular Mechanisms and Ecological Aspects of the Infection Strategy ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Control Targets in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria: From Growth-Essential Processes to Anti-Virulence Strategies and Candidate Targets inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of novel jumbo and small bacteriophages infectingMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Occurrence ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Auxin biosynthesis and signaling drive virulence and plant adaptation in Dickeya dadantii.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- To Beet or Not (Just) to Beet: Ecology, Virulence and Genomic Insights Into the Leaf Spot Disease Causative Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Review
- Complete Genome Analysis ofGenes · 2026Article
- The SlCBL-SlCML24 module mediates silicon-enhanced resistance to bacterial wilt in Solanum lycopersicum.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
824 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many plant bacteriologists, if not all, feel that their particular microbe should appear in any list of the most important bacterial plant pathogens. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all bacterial pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate the bacterial pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 458 votes from the international community, and allowed the construction of a Top 10 bacterial plant pathogen list. The list includes, in rank order: (1) Pseudomonas syringae pathovars; (2) Ralstonia solanacearum; (3) Agrobacterium tumefaciens; (4) Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae; (5) Xanthomonas campestris pathovars; (6) Xanthomonas axonopodis pathovars; (7) Erwinia amylovora; (8) Xylella fastidiosa; (9) Dickeya (dadantii and solani); (10) Pectobacterium carotovorum (and Pectobacterium atrosepticum). Bacteria garnering honourable mentions for just missing out on the Top 10 include Clavibacter michiganensis (michiganensis and sepedonicus), Pseudomonas savastanoi and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. This review article presents a short section on each bacterium in the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intention of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant bacteriology community, as well as laying down a benchmark. It will be interesting to see, in future years, how perceptions change and which bacterial pathogens enter and leave the Top 10.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.