ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Biomine: predicting links between biological entities using network models of heterogeneous databases.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA Sequencing Analyses for Deciphering Potato Molecular Responses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Using Literature Based Discovery to Gain Insights Into the Metabolomic Processes of Cardiac Arrest.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- Interactive exploration of heterogeneous biological networks with Biomine Explorer.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Indirect association and ranking hypotheses for literature based discovery.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Predicting disease-related genes using integrated biomedical networks.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Representing and querying disease networks using graph databases.BioData mining · 2016Review
- OVA: integrating molecular and physical phenotype data from multiple biomedical domain ontologies with variant filtering for enhanced variant prioritization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Article
- Expression analysis of all protease genes reveals cathepsin K to be overexpressed in glioblastoma.PloS one · 2014Article
- GoMapMan: integration, consolidation and visualization of plant gene annotations within the MapMan ontology.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: a novel paradigm of drug discovery: a comprehensive review.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2013Review
- CoIN: a network analysis for document triage.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiological databases contain large amounts of data concerning the functions and associations of genes and proteins. Integration of data from several such databases into a single repository can aid the discovery of previously unknown connections spanning multiple types of relationships and databases.
resultsBiomine is a system that integrates cross-references from several biological databases into a graph model with multiple types of edges, such as protein interactions, gene-disease associations and gene ontology annotations. Edges are weighted based on their type, reliability, and informativeness. We present Biomine and evaluate its performance in link prediction, where the goal is to predict pairs of nodes that will be connected in the future, based on current data. In particular, we formulate protein interaction prediction and disease gene prioritization tasks as instances of link prediction. The predictions are based on a proximity measure computed on the integrated graph. We consider and experiment with several such measures, and perform a parameter optimization procedure where different edge types are weighted to optimize link prediction accuracy. We also propose a novel method for disease-gene prioritization, defined as finding a subset of candidate genes that cluster together in the graph. We experimentally evaluate Biomine by predicting future annotations in the source databases and prioritizing lists of putative disease genes.
conclusionsThe experimental results show that Biomine has strong potential for predicting links when a set of selected candidate links is available. The predictions obtained using the entire Biomine dataset are shown to clearly outperform ones obtained using any single source of data alone, when different types of links are suitably weighted. In the gene prioritization task, an established reference set of disease-associated genes is useful, but the results show that under favorable conditions, Biomine can also perform well when no such information is available.The Biomine system is a proof of concept. Its current version contains 1.1 million entities and 8.1 million relations between them, with focus on human genetics. Some of its functionalities are available in a public query interface at http://biomine.cs.helsinki.fi, allowing searching for and visualizing connections between given biological entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.