Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22671717›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2013

Validity and reliability of the Chinese translation of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).

Kristine Vaughan, William C Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Prevalence of preoperative multidimensional frailty and associated factors in middle-aged and older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristine VaughanDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia and the GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William C Miller

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo translate and assess the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).

methodsParticipants included Chinese individuals >65 living in the community or assistive living facilities. At baseline, 73 subjects completed the translated PASE, and Chinese versions of three other scales to evaluate validity; the Timed-Up and Go (TUG), the Older American Resources Services Activities of Daily Living (OARS ADL), and the Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC). At follow-up, 66 subjects completed the PASE and a questionnaire to determine if there were any changes in health over the retest period.

resultsThe mean baseline PASE-C score was 76.0 (±49.1) at baseline and 78.33 (±50.27) at follow up. Correlations between the PASE-C and other variables were: age r = -0.51; TUG r = -0.52; OARS ADL r = 0.56 and ABC score r = 0.62. The retest reliability was ICC = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.86).

conclusionOur results indicate that the PASE-C has acceptable reliability and there is support for validity in the older Chinese population.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMotor ActivityAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLanguageMalePostural BalanceProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID22671717
PMCPMC3540101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.