Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22670138›Full record

ArticleMolecular syndromology2012

Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome.

M Peippo, J Ignatius

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular syndromology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Two unrelated individuals carrying rare mosaic deletions in TCF4 gene.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biology open · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M PeippoDepartment of Medical Genetics, The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
J Ignatius
Turku University of Applied Sciences · FIVäestöliitto · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS, MIM #610954) is characterized by severe intellectual disability, typical facial features and tendency to epilepsy, panting-and-holding breathing anomaly, stereotypic movements, constipation, and high myopia. Growth is normal or only mildly retarded, but half of the patients have postnatal microcephaly. Remarkably, congenital malformations are practically nonexistent. The cause of PTHS is de novo haploinsufficiency of the TCF4 gene (MIM *602272) at 18q21.2. Altogether 78 PTHS patients with abnormalities of the TCF4 gene have been published since 2007 when the etiology of PTHS was revealed. In addition, 27 patients with 18q deletion encompassing the TCF4 gene but without given PTHS diagnosis have been published, and thus, the number of reported patients with a TCF4 abnormality exceeds 100. The mutational spectrum includes large chromosomal deletions encompassing the whole TCF4 gene, partial gene deletions, frameshift (including premature stop codon), nonsense, splice site, and missense mutations. So far, almost all patients have a private mutation and only 2 recurrent mutations are known. There is no evident genotype-phenotype correlation. No familial cases have been reported. Diagnosis of PTHS is based on the molecular confirmation of the characteristic clinical features. Recently, a Pitt-Hopkins-like phenotype has been assigned to autosomal recessive mutations of the CNTNAP2 gene at 7q33q36 and the NRXN1 gene at 2p16.3.

Identifiers

PMID22670138
PMCPMC3366706
OpenAlexW2065977493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.