ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2012
Treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, where to go?
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory Manifestations of Systemic Diseases in the Central Nervous System.Current treatment options in neurology · 2020Review
- [De-escalation of therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitides].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2017Review
- Stem cell therapy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014Review
- Unmet needs in respiratory diseases : "You can't know where you are going until you know where you have been"--Anonymous.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of (oral) cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) has strongly improved prognosis but the side effects of long-term CYC treatment are serious. A number of recent randomized controlled studies have shown that the cumulative dose of CYC can be strongly reduced in the treatment of AAV or even reduced to zero. Maintenance treatment can be performed with azathioprine (AZA), or methotrexate (MTX) in case of intolerance, although the intensity and duration of maintenance treatment is still under discussion. More insight into the mechanisms involved in relapsing disease might allow individualized treatment. Induction of remission can be achieved in cases of mild disease expression with MTX but requires maintenance treatment to prevent relapses. Generalized disease can be treated with pulses of i.v. CYC or, possibly, with MMF. However, recent studies demonstrate the efficacy of RTX in inducing remission without the concomitant use of immunosuppressives. Corticosteroids are part of treatment in all regimens but the intensity and duration of steroid treatment is still being discussed. In life-threatening disease, the adjunctive efficacy of plasma exchange has been demonstrated and its usefulness in less severe disease is under investigation. Taken together, there are, indeed, alternatives for CYC in AAV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.